Is public opinion important for leader of a nation? The answer is probably yes since the general public is the basis of a nation. Then should a leader adhere to particular principles even at the sacrifice of disagreeing with the public? The responds might vary since some dictators might also share such feature. In my view, a leader should stay committed to particular principles and objectives which are vital for the long-term development of the country.
To begin with, it is understandable that some people contend that political leaders must always follow the public opinion and quit some principles when needed as compromise. For a modern country, democracy is often one of the fundamental principles the nation depends on. To be democratic, important political events like president election and foreign policy making should be completed in a way with the general participation of citizens. Once a leader drop the principle of following the will of citizens, he or she could become a dictator with only passion for his or her own power instead of the overall future of the nation and its citizens. In that case, the citizens might be imposed with severe tax and fierce laws without recognition of humanity and modern moral notions. Frequent wars might begin and price of goods begin to inflate, when families are torn apart. Life of common citizens could be miserable without restriction on political leaders from the general public.
However, public opinion could sometimes be misguided or exploited by cunning plotters to achieve their own purposes. Several years ago mass waves of refugees from the Middle East countries like Syria asked for citizenship in developed Europe countries like Germany and France. Refugees, compared to native citizens in the developed European countries, are commonly less educated without either enough skills to find a job or sufficient money to build a shelter. At first leaders of the European countries insisted on strict admitting policy. But they later have to open gates of their countries to let the less qualified people in after a global wave of media reports on the sympathy affections with the refugees. As a consequence, the refugees have greatly lifted the crime rates of burglary, robbing and even rape in those admitted countries, which has severely deteriorated the living quality of the native citizens of those nations. If leaders could stick on the principles of scrutinizing quality of admitted foreign citizens in their countries, living situation could have not worsened so quickly.
Considering that too much power could transform a qualified leader into a dictator, there should also be supervision institutes watching the behaviors of nation leaders. As stated above, in critical situations a leader with consistency with nexus principles and targets could guide the nation in a more promising way. There could also be cases in which the leader have engaged in some conspiracies for personal/family power and interest. In these situations, supervision institutes ought to examine and evaluate the possible consequences of the choices made by the leader with sensible minds. Once the approach the leader choose to adopt is considered to be imbalanced with more negative effects, measures could be taken to hinder the leader and keep the nation on the right track.
In sum, a leader who could stay committed to particular principles and objectives which are vital for the long-term development of the country would produce more promising decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...n? The answer is probably yes since the general public is the basis of a nation. Then should a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: DT_RESPONDS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'response'?
Suggestion: response
...ice of disagreeing with the public? The responds might vary since some dictators might a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 968, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...striction on political leaders from the general public. However, public opinion could some...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2965.0 2235.4752809 133% => OK
No of words: 563.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26642984014 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87110059796 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78318074224 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 215.323595506 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50621669627 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 940.5 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.374767605 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.52 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.64 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242958730364 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789625969543 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066132231831 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14289545182 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492666093451 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 154.0 100.480337079 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.