A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The recommendation propounds an idea which student curriculum should remain constant for throughout the country before they attend university. By my reckoning, this recommendation purely would be successful to some extent so some supporting consideration should be taken into account to improve this recommendation.
Utilizing this recommendation merely in educational system could have some negative consequences for student future educations. If the constant curriculum does not have an efficient variety of the different realm of science, art, music, sports, ... would end up in confining students interest and conducive to eliminating some of their hidden intelligence. Looking more concise, consider a student with a stunning ability and intelligence in soccer who has to study an abundant course about physics and mathematics rather than pursue its interest and improve its intelligence in sports because of the limited courses in his/her curriculum. It is far more likely to abandon sports due to the fact that most of his/her time and energy is consumed by studying science courses which at the end could substantially harm his/her future ahead.
On the other hand, considering the recommendation for setting the educational curriculum for pre-university students provide students with some characteristics could pave the way for choosing their latter path in their educational life. For example, they will be wise and knowledgeable enough because of their valuable experience in acquiring knowledge in different parts of science world (pure science, art, music, sports, ...) to find the best way of employing their educations for constructing their future.
In summary, considering both advantages and drawbacks of this incomplete recommendation, adopting this approach could bring more positive points for students' education but as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph some justifications should be taken into account to enrich this recommendation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, as to, for example, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.82638888889 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25156872412 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586805555556 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8244276611 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.545454545 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1818181818 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166121508546 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666446640231 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494845827006 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103307159889 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346185802164 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.1392134831 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 48.8420337079 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 12.1639044944 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.