A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The development and growth of any country depend upon the overall development of students and the development of the students is determined by the education they receive. Thus, it is the responsibility of a nation to provide quality education in all the parts of the country. To maintain standards in education all over the country, the nation should decide the curriculum very carefully. However, in some country, the curriculum is determined by states rather than a nation. Consequently, there is a significant difference in the quality of education in different parts of a country. Thus, I agree with the suggestion that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national syllabus until they enter college.
There are many advantages of introducing a common curriculum in all the parts of a nation. One of the advantages is that all students receive the same standards of education in a school. Thus, this policy in education help students whose parents have to change job frequently. For instance, if parents of a student are in military service then they have to change place often, consequently, their children also have to change school. If a different syllabus taught in a new school then it will definitely affect the academic performance of the students. On the other hand, if a common curriculum is taught in all the schools of a country the process of changing school will become easy of students.
Today, modern society is full of competition, thus you are a part of rat race whether you like or not. Even students are also part of a competition, for instance, they have to compete to secure a seat in reputed college or university. Students have to compete to get a scholarship from NGOs and government. So, The best way to prepare students for the competitive world is to provide standard education to all of its students. The only way to ensure quality education in all the states of a country is to introduce the same national curriculum in all the schools of a country. By introducing a common curriculum, we can assure that all the students from rural to urban receive the same level of education in all the schools.
However, there are certain situations in which static national curriculum can create a problem. Every state in a country is known for its arts, music, dance, native language, etcetera. If a common syllabus will be introduced then states may fear to lose for what they have been known. For example, Gujarat is a western-most state of India. Gujarat has reputation for Gujarati language and "garba" all over the world. So, if schools in Gujarat do not teach the Gujarati language then it may be disappeared. Thus, according to me, schools have authority to make some modification in the national curriculum according to
In conclusion, I believe that a nation should introduce basic national curriculum in all the schools of a country to maintain the same standards of education all over the country. However, I suggest that schools should also have the authority to introduce new subjects according to their states and requirement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 593, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in different parts of a country. Thus, I agree with the suggestion that a nation ...
^^
Line 3, column 435, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ir children also have to change school. If a different syllabus taught in a new sc...
^^
Line 7, column 428, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d 'garba' all over the world. So, if schools in Gujarat do not teach the Guj...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, may, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2589.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96928982726 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94023467437 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.385796545106 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 842.4 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9167540334 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5769230769 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0384615385 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34615384615 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401003350689 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118019318327 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147507972118 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246912669297 0.150359130593 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123475842342 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.