A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

The issue of whether a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college is a contentious one. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that students should follow the same curriculum till they enter college, because the same curriculum would be effective in maintaining standards of education all over the nation. Furthermore, having the same curriculum would mitigate the discrepancies of grading the students before they enter college, and it would be easy to add and mandate syllabus that can teach national history and environmental awareness which are very essential for the betterment of society.

First, having the same curriculum all over the nation will be effective in maintaining the standards of education. In rural areas where the awareness of education is low or where people give less importance to education, it is beneficial to follow the national curriculum. For example, if there is a local city which does not have teachers who are not capable of creating and following a curriculum of their own, a standard national level curriculum can decrease their burden. Furthermore, having a single curriculum will make it easy to maintain higher standards of education all over the nation because every topic can be scrutinised and maintained by the brightest minds across the country. Therefore, it will be more beneficial to follow the same curriculum across the nation.

Second, there would be no discrepancies or imbalances while comparing students across the places if they follow the same curriculum. For example, it is unethical to compare two students from different backgrounds of education given their dissimilarities. As students compete across the country for national wide colleges, evaluating them is very difficult if they don’t follow the same curriculum. Therefore, following a single national curriculum can bring all the students onto a single platform where they can be evaluated effectively and impartially.

Third, I think a single curriculum is easy to add and mandate syllabus that can teach national history and environmental awareness which are very essential for the betterment of society. I believe adding these topics to the curriculum would be more effective in teaching students right from their young age. The life of a person who knows about environment and national history will be different from someone who does not have this knowledge. For example, a student can learn from the past by studying history, and knowledge of environmental can help him to move forward in life without hindering the environment. Therefore, I believe this knowledge has a significant impact on the society. Hence, having a single curriculum can ease up the hassle of adding and mandating the essential syllabus.

Language is the way a person thinks, and it is hazardous to neglect the mother tongue. Some may argue that a national curriculum can suppress the local languages. This point is flawed because having a national level curriculum is not related to the suppression of local languages. As the national curriculum only mandates science and arts curriculum, local languages can be mandated at the respective state level. Furthermore, the student can take advantage of both the worlds by studying arts and science from the national curriculum and local languages which are mandated by the state.

In conclusion, effective maintenance of standards can be achieved, students can be compared without any impartiality and can easily add and mandate syllabus of national importance and environmental awareness. For these reasons, students should follow the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 97, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
... to neglect the mother tongue. Some may argue that a national curriculum can suppress...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, third, while, for example, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3145.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 584.0 442.535393258 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3852739726 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9652783439 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.388698630137 0.4932671777 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1010.7 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.466278694 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.8 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.36 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459485754295 0.243740707755 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169385954817 0.0831039109588 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166390751676 0.0758088955206 219% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295147571228 0.150359130593 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166070563665 0.0667264976115 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.