Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
The issue that society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents is a contentious one. If a society can choose and train children in their field of proficiency, they would be very helpful for the betterment of the society, and they can also start contributing to the society before many people in the field. While each side has its strengths and weaknesses, I believe that it might be difficult to identify children who have special talents and if we can find students who have them, it would be inflexible to enforce a single training on them.
First, there is no perfect way that can be used to identify children who have special talents. For example, if a child is good in lifting weights, it would not mean he would be the best weight lifter in future. Also, there is no guarantee that the child of a great scientist would become equally great in future if we can choose the children of celebritries as the children who have special talents. So, there is no perfect way to choose specially talented children which makes it challenging to give training and expect them to do great in their life.
Second, if we provide a single training to the children right from their young age, this would be restraining them from exploring other fields. We can not assume the real talent of a child because of his performance in one field. For example, if a child performs better in weight lifting and the society starts to give him the training of weight lifting leaving all other sports, it would be restricting him to explore his options. If the child has his real talent in cricket, we would be losing an excellent cricket player because he exhibited his talent in weight lifting initially. Also, if a child can perform best in more than one field, giving training of only one field is a disadvantage to the society because the child is not able to perform well in his fields of expertise. Hence, instead of enforcing a single training, a student should be given the liberty of exploring his fields which would be in turn beneficial to the society.
Third, providing training in one field leaving other fields can be stemming. For example, because the child is talented in science, he can not neglect the importance of studying arts. By studying arts, the student can improve creativity which would be very helpful in innovating something in science. To cite an example, the researcher who solved the np-hard problem of random walk is a professor in electrical and related the way current flows to the random walk problem which helped him in getting a patent. Hence, we can not neglect some field over another because the child is performing well in one.
If we assume that the society can identify the children who have special talents, it would be beneficial to give them training right from a young age. Because the child need not waste his time in learning other fields which might not be helpful for him, he can concentrate and train himself to be the best in his field of expertise. If the child is given training right from his young age, he can be more productive, and he can also start contributing before many people in the field which would benefit the society enormously. For example, if the child is talented in space research, he need not be trained in cricket, he can instead spend more time strengthening his research skills which will be very helpful in future. However, because there is no perfect way to identify children who have special talents, it might not be beneficial to provide training of only the fields of expertise to them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...mean he would be the best weight lifter in future. Also, there is no guarantee that the c...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 494, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'giving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: giving
...ted children which makes it challenging to give training and expect them to do great in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: better
...field. For example, if a child performs better in weight lifting and the society starts to give ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 713, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...earch skills which will be very helpful in future. However, because there is no perfect w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, then, third, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 36.0 12.4196629213 290% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 33.0505617978 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3008.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 638.0 442.535393258 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71473354232 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.02579962599 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51221209275 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.344827586207 0.4932671777 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 909.0 704.065955056 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.10617977528 419% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.323621036 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.782608696 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7391304348 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78260869565 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341616880443 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139083449231 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173854129523 0.0758088955206 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246912969059 0.150359130593 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171747559117 0.0667264976115 257% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 48.8420337079 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.8971910112 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.7820224719 153% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.