A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Essay topics:

A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.

Students are the building blocks of the society that is the future belongs to them. It is imperative to have a curriculum which bolster the career of student and make them independent in their lives. The prompt given mention that the national curriculum should be followed by students until they enter in college. I partially agree to the claim for below reasons.

National curriculum followed by entire country makes the bonding between students strong. It creates a force of unity. All students learn the same things and before they start college they are on the same page. We can agree to claim to an extent that government of the nation want their students to follow the national curriculum so that they are all taught the idea of unity. If government includes only one language in their curriculum which is the national language this shows the patriotism towards our nation. The idea here is that Nation comes first and not states. With advantages of unity there are still some limitations that is if government do not include the regional languages in their curriculum there is possibility that students will not get the opportunity to know about their cultures. Culture of different region maintains the diversity of the nation. People from different religions, cast, race come together to share their experience in a way which leads to the development of humanity. Because of these reason we cannot completely agree to the claim.

National curriculum will help the students to start of their career in colleges with every other student being at the same level. This is the first step of student to apply their interests in field which they are fond of. But this do not stand complete as whole because students should be given opportunity to take up the courses of their interest in schools itself so that they are made independent and self sufficient in their field of interest. If they are not given this chance they will be more dependent on their teachers or parents to make their decisions. Again we can see that there is partial agreement for the example taken above.

Also, Governments might be interested to go with national curriculum so that they can hide their wrongdoings behind the nation's future. They might be interested in teaching students what they want to taught. This can be considered some sort of tyranny to an extent. There is an imperative guideline that students need to follow keeping their interests aside. But there is also possibility that Government want their students to learn the national curriculum because they want their students to be part of the nation even after they complete their studies and work for the welfare of country.

We can come to conclusion with mixed reasoning for the claim. There are advantages as well as limitations we have to consider to have a better understanding.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... they are all taught the idea of unity. If government includes only one language i...
^^
Line 3, column 1009, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...h leads to the development of humanity. Because of these reason we cannot completely ag...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, well, sort of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2367.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95188284519 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58407497901 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.445606694561 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 737.1 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.9850543639 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0384615385 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23076923077 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353527545433 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1080418821 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11354063938 0.0758088955206 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202419383308 0.150359130593 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113483331833 0.0667264976115 170% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.