"A nation is built by values, individuals who are educated and wise enough so that they would lead the country into the future of enlightenment and prosperity."
People are of the core essence and are an invaluable element of democracy who decide the pathway of the nation towards tomorrow, the better day. Rules, Laws, and regulations are built by politicians, but it's people who are responsible for keeping the lawmakers in power. Education, thus, becomes of an important characteristic in a citizen's way of life. Nations are built by students, the unstoppable force who can achieve summits, once seem unprecedented by its creators. The given statement suggests that nations should have a standard curriculum until their student enters college. I partially agree with its message, due to three main reasons.
Having a standard of education until pupils enter college would work good in countries like the United Kingdom or the United States, where there is a standard board of education that didacts schools and colleges to impart a certain level of knowledge until he reaches college. This not only maintains a uniform code of conduct but also gives liberty to colleges to maintain their curriculum in sync with the uniform level of education attained by every college aspirant. It would work wonders where students often take very divergent schemes of degree, which provides them with a minor amount of knowledge about every field of education or career. So in such scenarios, there wouldn't be a case where a student has a predilection to a particular field but doesn't have credible information about its ins and outs.
Adding to this, having a similar national curriculum also feeds colleges of doing the arduous task of bringing every candidate to a certain level, so that the education later received, does not seem ambiguous or difficult for him. For instance, Let's say there is a student who knows algebra too well and is deficient about any knowledge related to geography. Even though he has a knack for geography, he won't be able to achieve it completely. Even after this, if he pursues a career in geography, this would then require his college of setting some prerequisites to be completed before coming into the mainstream of the whole degree. This indirectly indicates, that it falls upon the college of doing this unimportant, yet, required a set of processes.
However, having a standard, uniform means of educations also bag some disadvantages and adds banality to it. Receiving a uniform amount of knowledge since their childhoods, students tend to be lethargic, disinterested towards competing with each other on certain areas that ache for fierce competition. Things won't be appreciable enough if one does not compete or fight for it. Countries like China and India grant it's institutions invariable freedom of imparting knowledge to any level. So this means, that there should be students who could have more knowledge, in-depth about a particular topic, which make them able to get any domain-oriented jobs after graduating from college.
Overall, in conclusion, I would like to say, that as a coin has two sides to it, it falls upon the viewer of understanding the essence and faults of having a uniform national curriculum. Demographics and culture should also play a cardinal role in deciding between maintaining either of the two convictions. There might be ifs and buts attached to both of these methods, but the decisions and the actions should always be taken with the confidence and satisfaction of the college committees and teachers into consideration. Because they are the only instigators, and the catalysts of shaping the futures of raw, unventured minds of the nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 677, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... or career. So in such scenarios, there wouldnt be a case where a student has a predile...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 756, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... predilection to a particular field but doesnt have credible information about its ins...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 90.0 58.6224719101 154% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3133.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 606.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1699669967 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96155895361 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90092673874 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 317.0 215.323595506 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523102310231 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 988.2 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3852309296 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.541666667 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04166666667 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196899868032 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575853601165 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443477049013 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10368447758 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044322787617 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.8971910112 134% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.