A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Every society is dependent on its younger generations to prosper. Education, therefore, has been one of the most crucial part of every nation. It is propelling to set a national curriculum for the students, because one unified curriculum empowers the government to control overall population literacy. Moreover, such standard allows for the government to sift students, enabling further stratification. However, a nation's thrive is not an inroad in which people's free will is sacrificed, neither should education be an accessible tool for government's manipulation. After all, students are all different; and their responsiveness to curriculums differs; despite their differences, they all deserve the right to fully explore themselves and to succeed in one's own way.
As mentioned above, education is essential in each nation's success. There are legal appeals to drawing a set curriculum for its large student population. English, for example, has been a requirement for many nations as it has been the dominating language in the world. The requirement to study english, despite all its controversies, has been proven to be effective and beneficial to a students' success in his later cosmopolitan career. Yet this requirement has not been universally accepted; recently an accumulating amount of voices are presenting their points of views that english, though helpful, deprives a student's choice of free will. Most of the dispute arises from a dissident opinion that no language class should be mandatory. A student should be able to choose his or her second language. The conflict aggravated as most governments see the need of english education as inseparable from its elementary educational system; however, the students won the battle as ethics is inclined with personal free will.
Despite the fruitful outcomes of including english in their curriculums, a lot of nations conceded to allowing an option for the students. As far as history goes, the ethical democracy has prevailed. It is not that a nation should always allow students to select his or her classes of will; it is the ethics behind a required, monotonous curriculum that is fault. With great power comes great responsibility. With this impregnable education system, the government bears too much responsibility for each and every student in its realm. No nation has the capability to care for all of its students in a way that cultivated the students' individuality notwithstanding this set of conformities.
To recapitulate, I oppose the notion of enabling a nation to exhaustively delineate all of its education curriculums because, first of all, it is not ethical to the students and secondly, it is not desirable or at least not achievable without great effort or great sacrifice with a nation's morality still intact.</span><br>
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 457, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
...abling further stratification. However, a nations thrive is not an inroad in which people...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...d above, education is essential in each nations success. There are legal appeals to dra...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 387, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ven to be effective and beneficial to a students success in his later cosmopolitan caree...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 626, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...s students in a way that cultivated the students individuality notwithstanding this set ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... great effort or great sacrifice with a nations morality still intact.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, after all, at least, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 443.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.460496614 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36557569458 2.79657885939 120% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516930022573 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 756.0 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8878676961 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.19047619 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0952380952 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52380952381 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244570751339 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737011289394 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433566079083 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161818696728 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00580786129224 0.0667264976115 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.