According to the given statement that a nation should mandate that before entering the college, the students should study the same national curriculum, I agree with the author to some extent. The various reasons to support my argument are given in subsquent paragraphs.
Firstly, education should be provided to a student in order to broaden their thinking ability and acquire knowledge in the best possible way. Following the same curriculum all over the nation would negate the issues faced by the students in a region. India is a large country with 29 states and every student of state differ in their curriculum as a student from bihar would be good in aptitude because in this state the curriculum highly focusses on mathematics while a student from south India would be good in english as they focus on english mainly. Therefore, it is necessary for the schools to have a curriculum which helps and focusses equally on every subject and topic which would maintain an uniformity.
Secondly, having the same curriculum all over the nation would not give better results in country like India where there are additional courses added in the curriculum for language as there are myriad of different languages spoken and taught in India. Following a same curriculum would not burden the students and would treat them in a similar way as some state should would be burdened due to their course work and other may not have adequate or necessay emphasis on their course or curriculum. Hence, it is necesssary for a nation to regulate the same curriculum all over the nation in order to maximize the potential of students globally.
However, there are always two two sided of a coin as following the same course upto 12th standard would not allow student to study according to their choice. It is necessary for every student to attain the basic knowledge in order to enable them to decide their interest and passion. Without having the knowledge of the subject or stream they want to choose they would not be able to develop their interest easily. Moreover, they might feel burdened due to heavy coursework as in higher classes the topics increases and deep knowledge is required which can't be achieved easily with too many subjects. Thus, it is recommended that there should be segregation of curriculum for different fields after 10th standard so that a student can gain knwoledge in much better way without loosing their interest. In the conclusion, I can say that there should be a uniform curriculum all over the nation but there should be categories to choose for a student on the basis of different fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... subject and topic which would maintain an uniformity. Secondly, having the sa...
^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...urden the students and would treat them in a similar way as some state should would be burdened ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 27, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: two
...globally. However, there are always two two sided of a coin as following the same c...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 554, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...es and deep knowledge is required which cant be achieved easily with too many subjec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92533936652 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54392122237 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.454751131222 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9551870626 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.133333333 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4666666667 23.4991977007 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358782969229 0.243740707755 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139021119945 0.0831039109588 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123775368163 0.0758088955206 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257973070547 0.150359130593 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635657843338 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 48.8420337079 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.