A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
The statement emphasizes on same national curriculum for all students till they reach college. Some degree of similarity in the curriculum is desired but it is not necessary to implement exactly the same system all over the country and it may not be necessary to continue till college. In fact, curriculum should reflect the need and history of the region to some extent. But, a totally different system in each region may cause problems for students as well as to college authority.
Firstly, national curriculum can make compulsory to all students across the nation. Some subjects are necessary to build up the foundation for further college education and even our daily lives. For example, we need knowledge of mathematics in every aspect of our lives, we all need to know our history and everyone should have proper communication skills to be successful in life. To deal with these basic criteria to live without depending on others, every school and high school should have curriculum which will cover all these aspects. And here comes the necessity of same curriculum to some extents. Because, if each institution deals with these basic subjects differently, the learning outcome will be different and students may not be completely skilled in these basic subjects if the school authority is can't properly build a curriculam on their own. Besides, a wide variety of standardized curriculum is necessary for all to provide everyone with chance of exploring different fields and find their interest.
However, there is little need to have exactly same curriculum all over the nation without the basic subjects which are necessary for all and important to deal with daily matters. Suppose, a high school student who has already dealt with basic and wide variety of subjects implemented by national curriculum, may find interest in a particular field. For example, that student may find interest in electronics but one of his friend whom he shared class with may find interest in anthropology. So, in that case after some level of school education, all student should have freedom to select courses according to their interest which would make them well prepared for the college education in their field of interest.
In conclusion, it's sure that same national curriculum to some extent is necessary to deal with basic daily matters. If totally different curriculum is implemented from elementary school, it'll also create problems to college authorities to deal with a wide variety of students. But, after some degree of compulsory curriculum to be followed by each and every institution, the students should have a degree of freedom to choose courses according to their interest and the school authorities should have freedom to design at least some courses according to the regional need. We neither want a student to be a victim of capricious curriculum implemented solely by school authority nor want a student with mental pressure who is interested in accounting dealing with calculus unnecessarily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 814, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...sic subjects if the school authority is cant properly build a curriculam on their ow...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, well, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2526.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18685831622 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76461693805 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.416837782341 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 808.2 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7229522456 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.947368421 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6315789474 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73684210526 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270521460617 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113828861578 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917566234008 0.0758088955206 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202107996605 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344475496154 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.