A nation should require all od its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
the speaker claims that students should all participate in coherent courses before they go to university. In my view, I agree with this notion, and I will show my analysis below.
To begin with, in order to fully understand the advance topic one needs to learn a range of basic knowleges. For example, many science theories are based on investigations and sophistication the of previous generation. Newton's law is base on calculous, and Einstein's general relativity is establish under the concept of Newton. The invention of computer technology is base on numerous breakthrough: from basic scientific knowledge to nano technology. Therefore, the common courses before the university provide students with adament foundation for their further exploration in academic fields.
Furthermore, there are several required skills need to be developed for students to ensure their sustainences in our society. These skills including, math, language, and so on. In the dailylife, it is a lot of chances to use our basic calculation ability, from buying necessities to saving money in the bank. Also, language courses provide students with essential skill to assimilate new information from newspaper to academic journals. Thus, the common course build the substantial skill for students which cannot be abandoned.
Admittedly, learning the homogeneous things may limit the ability of innovation for students. However, we can apply other method to maintain the momentum of creativity; by encourage students think of different aspects in the same topic, it can foster their cirtical thinking, which is helpful for students to come up with new idea and make breakthrough in the future courses. To illustrate, in the math class, teacher can show different approachs to solving the same question, which make students think creatively. Therefore, it is not contradictory to maintain the creativity in homogeneous courses.
To sum up, the common courses is necessary in the period before university, not only it build the concrete basis for students but also ensure they have enough skill that adapts themselves in the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the speaker claims that students should all...
^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'established'.
Suggestion: established
...us, and Einsteins general relativity is establish under the concept of Newton. The invent...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'builds'?
Suggestion: builds
...e period before university, not only it build the concrete basis for students but als...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45896656535 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98590103529 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592705167173 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.0495383262 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.647058824 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3529411765 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58823529412 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998725689731 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305373597527 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426603143177 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597684089958 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302749514224 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.