Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
When it comes to the issue that working on an assigned project, we always have two ways to choose: working individually and working together. Which one is the most effective way? In my view, I maintain that working together is the most productive one, and here are my reasons.
I concede that some people may assert that students will learn more efficiently when they work alone because they concentrate in the task more than working with others. However, it is usually not the case. Considering that situation that you work or study alone, more often than not you cannot complete the task on time. We have a natural of protraction, that is, they may delay the task or stuck into the problem that cannot solve by ourself. In this sense, working together provide us more benefits.
To begin with, students acquire more resources by working cooperatively. Everyone has its vantages and weakness. For example, in case of working on a research project, some people are adept to use computer programs, some are good at searching information, while others may be proficient in organizing and analyzing the date. Therefore, in a group work, people can compensate their weaknesses by others' assistances. As a result, they can tackle the hard problems and complete the project more smoothly and effectively.
Furthermore, peer pressure acts as an important role that facilitates the efficiency of the project. Comparing to the situation that people work alone that all of the schedule are controlled by themselves. Unfortunately, without superintended by other people, we have low efficiency causing by the temptation of unrelated things or protracting nature of human beings. By contrast, in a team work, people are under the pressure of others. For instance, when I worked on a scientific project in college I could remember I received the inquisition of the progress from my coworkers every day. It spurred on me not to protract my schedule and thus we were able to accomplish the project on time. From this, working together usually leads to a more effective result.
To sum up, from the analysis above, we can see working together possesses several advantages that can make up with the drawbacks of working alone. Not only people can find more helps and resources but also they work more efficiently by the reminding of others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive because it is primarily in cities that a nation s culture traditions are preserved and generated 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parents today are more involved in their children s education than were parents in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- At various times in the geological past many species have become extinct as a result of natural rather than human processes Thus there is no justification for society to make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money and jobs to save endan 90
- The chief benefit of the study of history is to break down the illusion that people in one period of time are significantly different from people who lived at any other time in history 58
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed Instead they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances times and places 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e situation that people work alone that all of the schedule are controlled by themselves. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.0286738351 145% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1949.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 387.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03617571059 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80733151642 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529715762274 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7698430082 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.5909090909 100.406767564 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.45110844103 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346553552108 0.236089414692 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994735820641 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765774811295 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198508490522 0.150856017488 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448987116878 0.0645574589148 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.