The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tool of human minds.
The speaker claim that machines will never be superior to human being. In my view, I disagree with this idea, and I will show my analysis in the physical and mental aspect.
Firstly, from the physical aspect, it is ostensibly true that machines are subordinate to humans. After all, machines are made by human, which to be called the triumph of human’s intelligence. Since the industrial evolution, machines have been rife in human’s lives. In the factories, mechanical arms help people assemble parts, manufacturing products, and assist workers to overcome the limitation of their flesh body. In the modern life, computer, a manifestation of machine, faithfully do the regular and complex jobs without resistance. These obedience and assistance images of machines provide an illusion that they will never one day surpass human being.
However, for the human’s deeper and more profound reliance on machines, we need to ask: who is the superior? Or, in other words, who cannot live without each of it? Consider that machines are integrated in every portion of modern world from the washing machine or cooking instruments to the infrastructure such as electronic system and productive enterprises, no one can imagine what the world look like in absence of machines. Without them, people lived in tropical or torrid zone cannot survive due to the lack of air condition; the regions that near the polar zone will find themselves cannot survive because of lacking heaters in cold weather. What’s more, if one day, the variety of services that we human enjoy and being sustained under the numerable different machines disappear, our civilization will collapse. These evidences show that although machines are the invention of human beings, their abilities are actually indispensable by humans. In this sense, the machines are superior than humans.
Secondly, from the mental aspect, it is plausible to conclude that human beings is in the ascendent position. We possess a wide range of unique properties, namely, creativity, organization, innovation, and consciousness, which are lack in machines. After all, for the cutting-edge machine like super computer, which can solve sophisticated problems or execute algorithms to mimic human’s behaviors, they are still be limited in specific purpose. They only do their job mechanically without any thinking.
Nevertheless, consider the fact that the human brain, the origin of those our unique properties, is consist of neurons. How we can’t predict that one day, the computer, which is consist of transistors, which have similar function of neurons, will not achieve a parallel ability of human? By increasing the amount of the transistors inside the computer and consummating the structure of computer, it is hard to claim the machine mind will not one day superior than human kinds. Think about that, it takes several hundred-thousands years of evolution for primates to become human and attain the civilization that we enjoy today, the invention of machines not exceed few hundred years. It is reasonable to assert that it just take time for machines to develop a comparable mental abilities as human.
To sum up, from the arguments that I show above, the level of dependency that humans rely on machines, machines have to some extend superior than humans. On the other hand, the potential of machines in the future makes many unique attributes of human today become replaceable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 542, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this obedience' or 'These obediences'?
Suggestion: This obedience; These obediences
...ar and complex jobs without resistance. These obedience and assistance images of machines provi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 994, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...n this sense, the machines are superior than humans. Secondly, from the mental as...
^^^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...igin of those our unique properties, is consist of neurons. How we can’t predict that o...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
...ct that one day, the computer, which is consist of transistors, which have similar func...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 460, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
... machine mind will not one day superior than human kinds. Think about that, it takes...
^^^^
Line 9, column 778, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'ability'?
Suggestion: ability
...machines to develop a comparable mental abilities as human. To sum up, from the argume...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 126, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...rely on machines, machines have to some extend superior than humans. On the other hand...
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 142, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
..., machines have to some extend superior than humans. On the other hand, the potentia...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, after all, such as, in my view, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2904.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 548.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29927007299 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83832613839 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86662279348 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527372262774 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 919.8 704.065955056 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.415443318 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.692307692 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.438646956873 0.243740707755 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123347931419 0.0831039109588 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935202887521 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23387255949 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411482632535 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 158.0 100.480337079 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.