In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero. The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.
With the advance of the media, people now are able to scrutinize the background and detail of a person much more exhausted than previous generation. Therefore, it raises a heated debate that whether or not the reputation of anyone will somewhat be diminished, so that it is impossible to deem someone as a hero. From my point of view, since nobody is a perfect human, I agree with that one’s prestige will to some extent be detracted, but for a real hero, a few foibles will not besmirch their prestiges.
I concede that everyone has its own foibles, the renowns of many celebrities will be detracted under the exhaustive coverage of media. To be specific, nowadays, the paparazzi are almost everywhere in the city. The details of the lives of famous people will be unveil by media. As a result, the “real” parts of human beings are no way to hide. For example, people usually presume famous singers or movie stars will dress like what they appear on the screen, that is, so elegant, beautiful and flawless. However, in their daily live, they may like ordinary people, wearing the slippers walking into a coffeeshop and in some circumstances, they even drop litters on the street. All these things, if being broadcasting on media, will definitely break their image of hero.
Nevertheless, for an authentic hero, their achievement, which have great contributions to the whole society, will not be diminished by these minor faults. The president Washington, leading American people to fight for their freedom and contributing for establishing the country is still be adored by people today although he secretly chopped his father’s cherry tree. Another example is that the Swiss girl who fight for conquering the global warming. Although she was captured by the media that she wasted a some food on the flight, she still merit for organizing a great amount of people to concern the issue of global warming, which the importance far outweighs the small amount of wast during her flight.
Furthermore, some behaviors, which are reckoned as bad things, are actually necessary to accomplish one’s goal. To illustrate, in a situation of emergency, such as pandemic, the administers may conceal some information from to be known by the publics, such as the location of infected cases. From the common value, to lie should be condemned. But in this case, it helps the government prevents the citizens from panic on one hand, and protecting personal secrets of the patients on the other. In my point of view, even though these bad things are uncovered by the media, it still not decay the prestige of a person.
To sum up, it can not be denied that media has uncover many details of a famous people and it would break their flawless image at the first glance. Whereas, people in wisdom would focus on the big picture, judging the status of a hero not merely on these small detail but look at the things a hero done for the whole society. Therefore, the reputation of those hero is still undiminished.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 192, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...erefore, it raises a heated debate that whether or not the reputation of anyone will somewhat ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'merits'.
Suggestion: merits
...ed a some food on the flight, she still merit for organizing a great amount of people...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 48, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'uncovered'.
Suggestion: uncovered
...up, it can not be denied that media has uncover many details of a famous people and it ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 356, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this hero' or 'those heroes', 'those heros'?
Suggestion: this hero; those heroes; those heros
...e society. Therefore, the reputation of those hero is still undiminished.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, for example, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2501.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 512.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.884765625 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75682846001 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67731123571 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 275.0 215.323595506 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537109375 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1540914513 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.681818182 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2727272727 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236720348901 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719796699198 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477376419231 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130042809374 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453290419766 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.