Nations should pass law to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain Discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take Consider the possible

Essay topics:

Nations should pass law to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
Consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Developing a country's wilderness area depending solely on how buoyant the economy of that country is. The government of a nation needs to channel funds strategically to bring in substantial income for the nation.
Moreover, for the wilderness area in a country to be preserved, it requires funding and proper monitoring by assigned taskforce. In the case, whereby a nation's economy is undergoing some crisis, I'd disagree with the implementation of the policy to preserve any wilderness area in that country. Considering that there are other crucial sectors directly involved with the citizens of the nation that needs funding, such as the health sector, transportation, education and agriculture(that inclines with feeding the nation).

If the policy is implemented, it can lead to a number of consequences such as little productivity of crops. Knowing fully well that any wilderness area has harsh weather conditions, that mostly include high temperature, which does not support numerous plantation that will help feed the nation. Having that in mind, the need to implement the policy of preserving the wilderness of that nation is discouraging. For example, the Sudan Savannah is a wilderness area in the Northern Asia continent, efforts has been made on the part of the government to preserve it but in the long run, the revenue derived from it was really below expectation.

Furthermore, lack of commitment of assigned taskforce from the government to oversee the wilderness area is also a disadvantage. Even if the government decides to channel some funds to implement the policy, lack of staunch personnels to handle the fund is skyrocketing as we hear of the embezzlement of the limited fund directed to such areas.

However, if the government will implement this policy, then proper monitoring of the fund assigned to it must be put in place.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...igned taskforce. In the case, whereby a nations economy is undergoing some crisis, Id d...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...ions economy is undergoing some crisis, Id disagree with the implementation of the...
^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Id) must be used with a third-person verb: 'disagrees'.
Suggestion: disagrees
...s economy is undergoing some crisis, Id disagree with the implementation of the policy t...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, then, well, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23825503356 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10233583541 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526845637584 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7370748621 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.083333333 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215347383819 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855165265182 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471397500872 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115644273152 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668922135537 0.0667264976115 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.