"Preserving wildlife is everyone's duty", although this quote seems cliche for some people, this has to be emphasized in their mindset as the economic gain is only part of the bigger picture. The government must educate its people to respect nature and wildlife through education or seminars that create awareness. The above-said claim by the government is valid for the following reasons.
Firstly, we should know that unlike a city, wildlife is always in peril state because of regular deforestation for man's needs, these chopped woods are then later used for commercial purposes for wealth. Every year forest fires are imminent because of rising temperature caused by global warming by felling trees which drastically affects the animal's lives by immolating them. For example, California, a state in the USA always reports that there is a wildfire every fall season. The houses near the forest will also face the danger of getting caught by fire, this also includes livestock and poultry which is a huge loss for the residents living there. According to the recent statistics by the weather foundation, they claim that the losses happened due to wildfires are roughly estimated to be over 20-45 billion dollars.
Moreover, the government can implement stricter law which prevents slaughtering of animals and illegal felling of rare trees found in the forest. These resources add a lot of value to a particular place and in turn, attracts more tourists who are eager to watch them. In fact, if the government sanctions more budget for wild-life national parks, this will further increase their income by charging the tourists for tickets. This indeed improves the economic growth needed by the government.
Lastly, even if some investors want to develop their business in the state, they could set up their business somewhere far from the wild-life like the desert. Here, they can do their work without affecting the wild-life because in a hostile place animals will not live there because of the hostile climate.
In conclusion, economic gains can be achieved by other means, by living in harmony with nature. This will not only benefit the wild-life but also the business.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the wild-life but also the business.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, moreover, so, then, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19718309859 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6089677947 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594366197183 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7919441793 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.3125 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195860720133 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0572711902127 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425773445247 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983359325194 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265231216543 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.