Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position

The issue topic has declared that nations should levy some specific legislation to hoard their remnant valuable amount of their wilderness despite considering economic development in their territories. I am fully acceding this authenticity noticing these premises. First, financial prosper even short or long-term prospect has made us to connive abundant justifications and morals in our world, despite the fact that, the importance of those creatures will be displayed to us by mother of nature in the future. Second, having considered negligible, we could observe the results of decline in economic situation by not noticing them in past. Finally, wildernesses in any place around the world carries numerous facts about the special region of their inhabitants that the value of them is so much higher than ephemeral monetary issues.

Admittedly, we all know now that what was our deleterious actions by wisdom and knowledge we possess nowadays. We have always thinking that economic prosper would merely lead us to ideal prosperity that we have assumed. Nevertheless, conniving our natural vicinity to reach our goals harms us more than the beneficial effect that we adduced by destroying our wilderness environment. For instance, we have seen the extinction of several species by obliterating their natural places by human being.

Similarly, in Kish island in Iran, several years ago, a colossal gas field had discovered which the huge facilities and mechanical instruments had transferred to the region for exploiting the discovered gas. Before that incident, bountiful numbers of dolphins were used to live in that region which by them, the people of that place, could make revenues from tourist who were attracted to them. However, after the advent of industrial tremendous effects, the dolphins were forced to abandon the region and that made the inhabitants of the island leave it too.

Historical treasures of different species are undeniable. Every disparate specie carries many authentications about our world that we could observe and enhance our knowledge about those facts by saving them in their natural places. Moreover, that wilderness have this capacity to show us the future of our world too, as well as, displaying past concurrently which is assessed, both morally and financially, much higher even sometimes incomparable to economic prospers.

In sum, obviously there are some enacted laws caring about animal rights but, without any doubt, our world is needing to react significantly more than before. Therefore, the detrimental effect by conniving them that affect us is so much higher genuinely. Logically, eliminating the living environment of them for our economic benefit, despite the fact that is so boorish, in long term future the harmful effects would reflect to ourselves undeniably.

Votes
Average: 9.4 (3 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 633, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...economic situation by not noticing them in past. Finally, wildernesses in any place aro...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ights but, without any doubt, our world is needing to react significantly more than before...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, even so, for instance, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 60.0 33.0505617978 182% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2391.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44646924829 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85720401077 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580865603645 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 750.6 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9933695061 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133423647741 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412694115928 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350763097182 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736279507258 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347601281682 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.38706741573 116% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.