Nowadays, the public sense of judiciousness has felt that the sovereignty of technology intensively on our routine life, it has shown a great positive and detrimental impacts. So far the broad dominance of modern-tech lifestyle is definitely diminishing the intelligence and acuteness of all generations. For instance, the applications and gadgets that are really facile to use are comprehensively affecting all aspects of our diurnal. Albeit, they are actively taking our susceptibility to devise and schedule our needs. The occurrence of more populist governments globally is another radical line of reason for interpreting the efficacious politic results in social media and new methods of advertising for concurring communities to think wisely or not for their country’s brighter future. Technologies are supernumerary addictive which leads people to connive investing time for their self-improvement and aggrandize their probable talents for having a brighter life to come.
Friendly displayed new technologies are provoking the intrinsic feature of human personality for inclining to be inmate and lazy. To Avoid brainstorming in all aspects like arithmetic calculations is because of the availability of fast calculators in our cellphones. Furthermore, surveys have depicted the less we are trying to conflict with our minds for solving conundrums, the less we augment our abilities to think skillfully. Also, artificial intelligence is taking human places in disparate fields and industries that concludes waning the human role in flourishing world-widely.
Social media is one of the most powerful influences of technology usage all around the world. Political parties are collaborating to put themselves in first places in the election races and that led to the opportunity of appearance of populist governments. Likewise, those governments are not populist shaped however conceptually carrying the ideas and beliefs of it. For example, Donald Trump, the president of the USA. He was not a politician at all. Nonetheless, he became the president of the United States abruptly. Imagining this kind of situation 50 years ago was not pragmatic. So far, without the presence of new technologies to advertise and penetrate the people choices. It is not going to be deniable seeing resemble stories as such.
Attraction for gadgets, people are drastically attached the to their different kind of devices. If I myself, could not be able to touch my smartphone once in a while to check on social network, I would feel the absence of a basis need like eating or drinking. Consequence of this highly addicted demeanor, discombobulated our genial life-cycle to think our plans of life accurately.
All in all, considering the beneficial and auxiliary effects of facilities brought by new technologies, we should make some curbs on our usage domain to put more time for reinforcing our rudimentary skills by obviating the sovereignty of technology on our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iable seeing resemble stories as such. Attraction for gadgets, people are drast...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, nonetheless, really, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2526.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52735229759 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29778538394 2.79657885939 118% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584245076586 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 810.9 704.065955056 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.7030458704 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.826086957 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8695652174 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133339782306 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.031907708975 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342585709539 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706857852186 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297384914218 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 159.0 100.480337079 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.