The statement declared, for rearing our children and educating them, it should not be only relied on tutors or pertinent area of educating offspring, by the way, it is the whole society responsibility to take roles in raising children. I am acceding this fact because of these reasons.
First, it is vividly clear that, as the number of the people who is concerned about the children futures rises up, the amount of experience that could help in the future ameliorates too. Second, in this way, prospects of students and children would bolster, for the reason, the whole community would have the point of view for them as future treasures. Finally, vice-versa, affiliation of a child improves for the place and the society that he/she has grown up in.
Second, it is a clear fact that, more people caring about one issue then more experiences and solutions are taking place to flourish the situation. For instance, imagine a child that is inclined to criminal activities, might school and teachers could occlude him to stop and connive his intrinsic, but the effect of them is not significant. Likewise, if he is being reprimanded from the whole community, the inclination of him will deteriorate genuinely. Hence, it is a matter of fact that numerous numbers of people could affect better than a few.
Finally, as this culture of caring continue the process of implementing in a society, sense of responsibility and judiciousness rise up in the society and this positive energy would help the region to empower a bright future for their children. For example, there are different kinds of associations for helping children to hold them in the right way such as drugs alerting groups. These groups are encountering the problematic situations of children, so, they could inform other parts of society to help and inhibit youngsters for not pursuing deleterious things. All in all, carrying this perspective is an auxiliary move for noticing children of a society as future treasures and help the to flourish.
With having this point of, children themselves would feel a deep affiliation to reprise all kindness that they have received in the future. they would have this idea to serve the community back and reprise them when they are in the place to retreat all favors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... that they have received in the future. they would have this idea to serve the commu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, if, likewise, second, so, then, for example, for instance, such as, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1904.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01052631579 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76419028333 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534210526316 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3699204773 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.933333333 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 5.21951772744 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112834252853 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391187453289 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404459132367 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718578466715 0.150359130593 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416394568734 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.