The argument conclusion” Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean,” rests weakly on three primary assumptions. First, it assumes that the woven baskets initially exist in Palean village. So far, the fact that, they had been discovered sooner in Palean does not exactly means that the baskets were not in the Lithos village first. Second, it declares that, absence of any evidence from boats is a radical line of reason that there were no boats at all. Finally, it presumes that whatever holds true for present is also true for the past.
The argument assumes the woven baskets, first, were at Palean village. Likewise, adducing only the consecutive time of discovery does not depict the certitude reality. Maybe those distinctive patterns had been in the Lithos before Palean. Nonetheless, the validity of the author’s idea on the name of Palean baskets here is basically questionable. As we have seen recently, amazing and outstanding historical places and artifacts more frequently, making a specific decision about timeliness and location of the archaeological items is getting more and more cumbersome. Albeit, if we imagine those baskets as Lithos baskets, it would be so challenging to confirm that where exactly was the origin of the baskets were.
Similarly, the argument’s conclusion depends on the assumption that lack of any signs of boats in the location is the reason of stating that, there were no boats. However, there might been boats that residue signs of them could have been destroyed by environmental calamities or disastrous wars. Moreover, archaeologists could not be able to find them until now. For instance, 2500 years ago, Iran faced the invasion of great Alexander and defeated by him that led to annihilation of capital of Iran. Numerous antiquated artifacts which were made by craftsman of that time, were obliterated in igneous fire. So far, there is no remnant of those valuable things. Hence, it could have been a resemble story for that region that the author should investigate more on it.
The another assumption made by the author to arrive at the conclusion is the wrong perception that the present situation is in definite homogeneous with the past situation. It has been stated that the Brim river is abyss and wide, Nevertheless, we are not certain about how was the dimension of that river ample years ago. Plausibly, it had become profound by natural incident such as earthquake. Thus, we need more reliable proofs on how deep was it on that period of time. If the river was not that deep, people could pass it and exchange their cultural experiences such as woven baskets. As we have testified amorphous places today like ancient palaces that had destroyed by natural catastrophes or baleful wars. With the assistance of modern technology, we could stimulate the original structure of them and observe the significance of their constructions.
In sum, this argument relies heavily on its assumptions, perhaps too heavily. Denying any one of these assumptions results in a weakened or, in some cases, invalid conclusions. With regardless to, the conclusion could be true by the existence of baskets in Lithos, the name of the basket, Palean, is not specifically referring to the origin of it. Concerning the lack of enough and reliable premises for ratiocinating the outcome of argument, to strengthen the argument, the author would need to not only address these three assumptions, but also to more firmly establish a link between the acute origin of woven baskets and reasons for proving it.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- not exactly. better to say: the sample size is not big enough. only 'a "Palean" basket in Lithos'.
argument 2 -- not exactly. better to say: maybe people in Lithos have boats.
argument 3 -- OK
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 29 15
No. of Words: 586 350
No. of Characters: 2908 1500
No. of Different Words: 277 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.92 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.962 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.697 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 206 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 163 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 107 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 70 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.207 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.401 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.724 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.253 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.443 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean,' rests weakly on three primary assumpti...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...vered sooner in Palean does not exactly means that the baskets were not in the Lithos...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'confirming'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: confirming
...hos baskets, it would be so challenging to confirm that where exactly was the origin of th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
...ere were no boats. However, there might been boats that residue signs of them could ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 694, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...uable things. Hence, it could have been a resemble story for that region that the author s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...iable proofs on how deep was it on that period of time. If the river was not that deep, people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e significance of their constructions. In sum, this argument relies heavily on ...
^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en baskets and reasons for proving it.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, similarly, so, then, thus, for instance, such as, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.6327345309 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 13.6137724551 169% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 28.8173652695 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 78.0 55.5748502994 140% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3022.0 2260.96107784 134% => OK
No of words: 586.0 441.139720559 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15699658703 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.56307096286 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85653499773 2.78398813304 103% => OK
Unique words: 295.0 204.123752495 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503412969283 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 950.4 705.55239521 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 19.7664670659 147% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5392557866 57.8364921388 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.206896552 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2068965517 23.324526521 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86206896552 5.70786347227 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206755642863 0.218282227539 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512589183863 0.0743258471296 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508580323939 0.0701772020484 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115691007941 0.128457276422 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513329028808 0.0628817314937 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32208582834 107% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 98.500998004 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.