The argument conclusion “To serve the housing needs of our students, Buckingham College should build a number of new dormitories.” rests weakly on these three primary assumptions. First, it had declared by the originator of the argument that the number of students would ameliorate and be doubled in 50 years. So far, 50 years terming for constructing new buildings is even exceeding long-term goals. Second, the average prices, as the author mentioned, has raised in recent years, therefore, the author completely denies traits of student-life that is illustrating us, we should not provide very expensive accommodates to encourage them study. Finally, the last assumption is declaring that an attractive dormitory would absorb potential newcomers of the university which is not correlating with the conclusion by building a whole new place in several dimensions.
Clearly, ratiocinating the conclusion has appealed reinforced justifications which had been accepted logistically. Constructing a building for probable needs of fifty years later is comprehensively questioning the validity of the writer’s assumption. For stimulating resemble situation, it is similar to build a very modern hospital with the most updated facilities for fifty years later. Without any doubt, the whole building an all the facilities would obsolete and effete in the pointed time. Hence, it would be a fallacious decision to start constructing now, regarding to the reason, all desires and tastes will be changed in that time.
The other assumption that made author to arrive at the conclusion is the wrong perception of raised prices in the town. Student-life carries on abundant facts and ideas and the most noticeable fact is simplicity of their lives during education. With regarding to that reason, pupils could choose to inhabit off the campus in cheaper places in the city that they could afford. Another suggestion is, establishing living off campus complexes a little far from university that would be so cheaper for potential future demand.
Similarly, the last assumption that author relies on it to reach the conclusion is definitely another petitio principii by adducing that an attractive dormitory could lead to increase of students. Admittedly, the author connives on the fact that the university could rebuild or facilitate the current campus and strictly reaches the conclusion of constructing disparate new buildings. Moreover, these new constructions are absolutely expensive and costly that the university could put the budget for enhancing other departments.
In sum, the author of this argument relies heavily on its assumptions, perhaps too heavily, to reach the conclusion. First goal and mission of universities should be the amelioration of value in societies. the author premises for this argument are not correlating logically for preceding to build a new campus at all.
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- not exactly
argument 2 -- not exactly
argument 3 -- not exactly
--------------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-appeared…
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 444 350
No. of Characters: 2386 1500
No. of Different Words: 227 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.59 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.374 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.998 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 187 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 142 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 112 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 85 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.368 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.158 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.526 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.303 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.538 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.078 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...the amelioration of value in societies. the author premises for this argument are n...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, if, moreover, regarding, second, similarly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 28.8173652695 94% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 55.5748502994 103% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 16.3942115768 79% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2466.0 2260.96107784 109% => OK
No of words: 444.0 441.139720559 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55405405405 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12030509269 2.78398813304 112% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 204.123752495 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.468620217663 112% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 705.55239521 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.76447105788 114% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1015814781 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.3 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 23.324526521 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.70786347227 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169554567215 0.218282227539 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497659174184 0.0743258471296 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100380228271 0.0701772020484 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853488459848 0.128457276422 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868987664269 0.0628817314937 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.3799401198 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.3550499002 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.5979740519 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32208582834 115% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 98.500998004 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.