Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
“Mother Nature”, as we call her, has to be protected when she needs protection since she has been taking care of us selflessly all this time despite our deleterious acts of cutting trees and killing wildlife. Despite the assertion that the wilderness areas could be developed for economic gain, it is imperative that we need to preserve each one of the very few wilderness areas we have got at present. I believe that nations should pass laws to preserve and protect any wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
The chief reason for my fundamental agreement with the author is that many wildlife species have already become rare and some are even on the verge of extinction. For example, there are very few reserves in India having Bengal Tigers. Even Red Pandas are becoming rare in the parts where they are found and are in a near extinction stage. If we do not protect their habitat to which they are accustomed to, devilish hunters might enter these areas and execute the last of them or the animals might try crossing roads which were built for economic gain on their wilderness and might end up getting hit by some vehicle. Thus, it is each nation’s duty to protect any wilderness in their nation from such dangers.
Another reason for my view is that by using the wilderness for developing infrastructure or roads or farms or anything, we are risking our own lives. For instance, there have been many cases where leopards from forest have entered the nearby residential areas and even attacked people. The reason this happens is that their land has been taken over by us. Now, they don’t have a place they can call home. So they try to get back their habitat by horrifying people. So, at least for the sake of our own safety, each nation should preserve any wilderness areas in their nation.
Thirdly, poaching is a dangerous crime. We need to have protection around the wilderness areas so that poachers are not able to enter the wilderness and are arrested for attempting crime.
Some might argue that there are scopes for lots of economic gain by developing these areas. Yet, we know that our lives are worth more than anything. Thus, nations must pass laws to preserve any wilderness areas remaining in their natural state.
For all the reasons stated above, I agree with the author that nations should enforce strict laws to preserve and protect any wilderness areas in their natural state, even if they could be developed for economic gain.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, thirdly, thus, as to, at least, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 436.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84403669725 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45521282739 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479357798165 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.470780679 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.577564502174 0.243740707755 237% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189543277586 0.0831039109588 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.232423889257 0.0758088955206 307% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362553306035 0.150359130593 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179061261508 0.0667264976115 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.