Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
The author of the statement claim that nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain. While some may argue that this statement holds all the time, others may counter that claim by providing examples in support of their claim. In my essay, I will highlight both sides of the argument, and also provide sound reasoning for my claim.
From the past few decades, the actions of human being had a worst effect on the environment. Today because of the pollution, deforestration, and the industrialization, we are facing problem like climate change(Global warming).In Eupore most of the countries are badly effected by the heat waves, more 50 people lost their life because of the heat waves. And the condition became even more worst when a country start their development at or near the natural site.
The above mention point supports that government should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state. But we cannot deny that development is important for the human kind and for the economy of a country. And if some areas is just preserved regardless anything as it is a natural site it will be unbeneficial. Before developing these area goveronment shoould find out that whether not devolping the natural state, will the government make their own loss or not. Because in today's competative world, no country doesn't want to stay behind from others in any field.
In a nutshell, we can say that the human activities has negative impact on the environment, but development is a need of a country. So, government should find out some solution to do development work in these state with minimal effect on the wildlife.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 59, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...decades, the actions of human being had a worst effect on the environment. Today ...
^
Line 4, column 225, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...oblem like climate changeGlobal warming.In Eupore most of the countries are badly ...
^^
Line 4, column 261, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[16]
Message: Did you mean 'badly affected'?
Suggestion: badly affected
...ing.In Eupore most of the countries are badly effected by the heat waves, more 50 people lost ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'worst' (without 'more') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: worst
...at waves. And the condition became even more worst when a country start their development ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 359, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'these areas'?
Suggestion: this area; these areas
...will be unbeneficial. Before developing these area goveronment shoould find out that wheth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 541, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...in todays competative world, no country doesnt want to stay behind from others in any ...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te with minimal effect on the wildlife.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 2235.4752809 65% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99317406143 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76428600657 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57337883959 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1254263938 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.538461538 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.23076923077 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.502605613123 0.243740707755 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173871338088 0.0831039109588 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.238954791704 0.0758088955206 315% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269183745013 0.150359130593 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174662236731 0.0667264976115 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.