Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Human activities have caused massive destruction of the environment. This has led to dwindling of natural resources and loss of habitats for flora and fauna. This, indeed, has resulted in ecological imbalance, and the effect of it is evident through processes like greenhouse effect and global warming. Hence, human activities have already impacted the environment a lot, and thus, we need to start focusing on preserving the environment even if it means giving up lucrative gains we get from nature.
We, human beings, are also dependent upon nature. Our existence is contingent upon a suitable environment, and we are not capable of surviving even if there is a slight change in the environmental conditions. With the continuous degradation of the environment, much of which is caused by economic motives of humans, the earth is continuously getting unsuitable to live. The present flora and fauna actually contribute to maintain the balance required for us to survive. They help maintaining the ecosystem, which is imperative to our existence. Even with the extinction of one species, the whole ecosystem gets imbalanced and this causes problems to humans too. One prime example of this imbalance happened in Amazon where people killed the carnivores for fur. With the lack of carnivores, the population of herbivores quadrupled and this led to destruction of the entire forest. At the end, even the herbivores died due to lack of food. The lack of granary caused decrease in rainfall and obviously decrease in gases like oxygen. Hence, the existence of humans in the place was put to danger. This example illustrates how profit driven activities by humans end up hurting humans themselves. Thus, it makes me believe that when it comes to environment, the economic motives should be sidelined and preservation should be prioritized.
Also, it is not entirely true that preservation of environment comes at the expense of economic benefit we can get from natural resources. For examples, national parks help preserve wilderness while enabling us to make economic gain by attracting more tourists. Even though establishing national park increases surveillance in the area, and thus, requires the government to invest time and effort in the area, the ultimate result is profitable to both the economy as well as the nature. Therefore, there are measures, like establishing national parks or wildlife reserves, that help preservation of wilerness without compromising the economic profit we can make from natural resources. Thus, even if we care about making economic benefit out of natural resources, there can be ways in which we still prioritize on conservation and make profit at the same time.
Hence, the most important thing for our existence is the environment itself, and the wildresness is imperative in maintaining a good environemt. There are ways in which we can economically benefit from the environment whitout hurting the wildresness. Therefore, I conclude that we should always make preservation of wildresness our priority, even if we need to cut down the economic profit we make out of them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to maintain' or 'maintain'.
Suggestion: to maintain; maintain
...e required for us to survive. They help maintaining the ecosystem, which is imperative to o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 465, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...esult is profitable to both the economy as well as the nature. Therefore, there are measur...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'hence', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.227436823105 0.240241500013 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.160649819495 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0812274368231 0.0880659088768 92% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0541516245487 0.0497285424764 109% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0523465703971 0.0444667217837 118% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135379061372 0.12292977631 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0505415162455 0.0406280797675 124% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.99951752264 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0270758122744 0.030933414821 88% => OK
Particles: 0.00541516245487 0.0016655270985 325% => OK
Determiners: 0.0884476534296 0.0997080785238 89% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0126353790614 0.0249443105267 51% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0126353790614 0.0148568991511 85% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3121.0 2732.02544248 114% => OK
No of words: 497.0 452.878318584 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.27967806841 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.58838876751 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.390342052314 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317907444668 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.243460764588 0.200843997647 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.177062374245 0.132149295362 134% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99951752264 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 219.290929204 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48893360161 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 56.9193606093 55.4138127331 103% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.88 23.380412469 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.027887199 59.4972553346 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.84 141.124799967 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.88 23.380412469 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.52 0.674092028746 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 51.6707444668 51.4728631049 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.5472972973 1.64882698954 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274726959358 0.391690518653 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127210167483 0.123202303941 103% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0732401204222 0.077325440228 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.486704058307 0.547984918172 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.147372521394 0.149214159877 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111355187474 0.161403998019 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496349728288 0.0892212321368 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.497934193092 0.385218514788 129% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00240236618187 0.0692045440612 3% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208517961846 0.275328986314 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334986129311 0.0653680567796 51% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 3.66592920354 164% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.5995575221 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.