The possibility to preserve remaining elements from wild is a question very discussed since it raises doubts between keep protecting these fragile environments or explore the areas when they can offer economic gains. Even considering the possibility that this nature remaining might be substituted by a profitable business it’s important to keep protecting such environments.
It’s possible that someone would see as a better option to explore for economic gains spaces that still have wild animal and plants but that were reduced to small areas. In general, these places are islands among urban areas and they could be very profitable if they were not protected by laws and the government itself. Many people that defend this type of exploration comprehends that land would be more useful if it wasn’t protected by environmental laws, since the land could be used to construct buildings that can create jobs and boost the economical dynamic of the area.
However, this vision could be considered mistaken for some reasons. Firstly, it’s very important to protect remaining nature, since these areas are still the home of many species of animal and plants. Government should resist the pressure of lobbies that what to use such spaces for economical gains. The example of the so called “Atlantic Florest” in Brazil is very illustrative of how important is to preserve wilderness in near by urban zones. The Atlantic Forest used to be in almost the whole Brazilian coastal zone, but the exploration of it resulted in only some remaining of this Forest next to cities such as Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. After pressure from many elements of society the rest of this forest were considered protected by environmental law which resulted in improvement in the populations of some endangered species of monkeys that only lived in this place. Since the Atlantic Forest surrounds important urban areas it was not easy to resist the pressure from many companies that wanted to explore these lands to construct buildings, but government and activists were able to protect the forest and helped in the slow recovery of this natural space.
In many other countries, natural spaces have been preserved and protected over economic interest, specially in developed countries where this kind of areas became a precious zone where it is still possible to feel and see the wilderness that were damaged and reduced by industrial exploration. If governments were not able to preserve and to enforce companies and societies to take care of these place, probably we were facing a more severe problem with environment in Earth. Moreover, the quality of life would be very reduced since people would not have green spaces anymore which could increase problems with whether and result in more animal menaced to be extinct from wilderness.
In conclusion, one can see the importance of governments protecting the wilderness, if considering that these spaces might be small or profitable zones for business. In this context, nations should in preserve wilderness, otherwise the lack of attention to these species could backfire in nations itself, since the society might lose quality of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
... important is to preserve wilderness in near by urban zones. The Atlantic Forest used t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 664, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s such as Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. After pressure from many elements of society ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, in conclusion, in general, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2696.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24513618677 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76106163814 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451361867704 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 859.5 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1139302314 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.588235294 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2352941176 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208093649775 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794737100959 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311132269368 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134100579069 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129954785425 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 14.1392134831 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.