In the internet era, the concern about the environment protection are increasing faster than ever. It has became a common sense that protecting the earth environment is to protect ourselves from the possible misery future. Nevertheless, there are various method to protect the environment with the prosperity of local people, making preserving all wilderness areas a blunt strategy.
To begin with, protecting wilderness areas could bring a considerable number of benefits to the whole human race in various aspects. The diversity from various species which depends on the reserve of habitats plays an essential role in various researching fields like the biology, medicine and even engineering. Additionally, several kinds of wilderness area are foundational part of the earth's biosphere. The swamp, for example, which is a kind of common habitat for fishes and insects as well as various plants, contributes to the stability of local weather by storing the water and generating oxygens.
Nevertheless, Protecting all the wilderness areas is not feasible in several undeveloped countries, in where the public suffer from hunger and poverty. Although the nature resources are sufficient in the undeveloped countries, people here are in the low material living condition, making the hunting and construct modern facilities the only way to improve their live quality. During the construction, damage to the natural habitats is necessary and under no condition should them to be blamed for their behavior since the protection of wildlifes for the biological diversity is based on the survival and prosperity of human being and the developd countries make simillar behavior hundreds of years ago. Given that the undeveloped countries need natural resources for the national flourish, it is not realistic for all the nations to formulate the policy of protection of wilderness areas.
Finally, setting the natural reverse is not the only method to protect the remaining wilderness areas, in contrast, the exploitation could coexist with the protection of wilderness areas. In China, the XiXi swamp in HangZhou is a famous sightseeing attraction for tourists, which is famous for the coexistence of human and wild animals. There are several area were divided into the natural reverses, while other area for sightseeing. The main commute method here is the electricity powered boat, which is pollution free. The profits of XiXi swamp would be used to maintain the cost for stuffs and maintenance of this national park. XiXi swamp national park exemplifies the technical possibility of making profits without damage to the natural environment. Therefore, the protection of natural area is not necessarily in the opposite to the exploitation.
To sum up, the protection of wilderness areas is essential but inferior to the well being of the human race. With proper method, the co-existence of exploitation and the protection of natual environment is of high possibility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...re increasing faster than ever. It has became a common sense that protecting the eart...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 390, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...rness area are foundational part of the earths biosphere. The swamp, for example, whic...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion could coexist with the protection of wilderness areas. In China, the XiXi swa...
^^
Line 13, column 349, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun area seems to be countable; consider using: 'several areas'.
Suggestion: several areas
...ce of human and wild animals. There are several area were divided into the natural reverses,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in contrast, kind of, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 33.0505617978 27% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2531.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 461.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49023861171 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97423305602 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496746203905 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5557026302 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.55 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.05 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263423893991 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834615370763 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596678419182 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140760789176 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605612832889 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.