sometimes we are assigned to work in a group on a project. do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
the group will be helped more by a person who will be willing to do what other group members want than by a person
who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do
In the modern society, the group cooperation plays as an essential part in the peoples' daily life. However, the trend of cooperation also come with varieties of problems. Individuals in a group have different characteristics, and it brings the team benefits as well as conflicts between group members. The topic raised a question of the importance of different individuals in a group. From my perspective, among those various characteristics I prefer those people holding the different opinion to the majority of the group.
Different opinions are essential in group cooperation. There always are some hidden problems that cannot be aware of by others but those people who hold the suspect on everything. If those hidden problems are not found in the beginning, it could increase as the past of time, and ruin the whole plan in the end. Take the example in the programming; it is very normal for programmers to form a group to complete some projects. In the early stage of the project developing, some flaws slightly come into being. Those hidden flaw, if remain unnoticed, would cause unrecoverable damage to the whole project in the final review of the project. In this sense, people holding different opinion are essential in a programming group, and thus sometimes they are called code reviewer.
Moreover, the different opinion can improve the quality of the final product. The different idea among group members would lead the group discussion. In the history of programming, there are various discussions originated from the disagreement between ingenious developers, and most of them gave birth to one or more incredible programming tools which play an essential role in many aspects of our daily life.
It is true that there are other kinds of people who perform as a base-stone of a group. Nevertheless, those dissents in the group are more important, because it could be risky to be a heretic when the majority of the group are consent with the same idea.
In a nutshell, from those evidence I mentioned above, we can safely draw a conclusion that the people who always like to stand in the opponent position to the majority perform an essential function in a well-developed team. They are not those favored one. However, They do contribute to the whole group in their way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...part in the peoples daily life. However, the trend of cooperation also come with ...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are always
...e essential in group cooperation. There always are some hidden problems that cannot be awa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e early stage of the project developing, some flaws slightly come into being. Tho...
^^
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the opponent position to the majority perform an essential function in a well-...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04461942257 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87396421292 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50656167979 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3420647381 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.05 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220206951506 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743658317489 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608904294971 0.0737576698707 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138029945305 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614041756341 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.