Sometimes people are assigned to work in a group on a project.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
The group will be helped more by a person who is willing to do what other group members want than by a person who often strongly insists that things should be done in a way that is different from what the group wants to do.
Use reasons and examples to support your position.
People tend to work in a group as it would bring ample opportunities. However, group working along with its merits brings about some controversies; one of which is conflict. In this regard, some people believe that should all members of a group have identical opinions, the group will be far more successful. Nonetheless, others speculate that conflict is a necessity for a group to prosper. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter, and in what follows the reasons corroborating my viewpoint will be elaborated.
First and foremost, conflicting views may lead to prosperity not only for group members but also for project. Indeed, as long as the conflict is handled rightly, it may help the group to function properly. It stands to reason that the group in which each member can express its ideas easily is a great place to demonstrate how group members tolerate opposing opinions. Its members, as a result, may be able to acquire communication and social skills and gain invaluable experiences. In addition to members, owing to innovative ideas originating from confliction, the project may thrive, as well. To put it in another way, in the modern world, which creativity is of paramount importance, the more creative people are, the more profit they make.
Secondly, the individuals participating in the discussions arising in a group appear to enjoy notable features, including responsibility, courage, persistence, passion, and motivation, which will facilitate achieving success, thereby resulting in significantly boosting the whole group’s level of capabilities. To further explain, these types of people possess the ability to take bold decisions; consequently, they can play a prominent role in managing the group whether in critical circumstances or under normal ones. Psychological studies have indicated that the presence of individuals whose opinions differ from others’ views in a group contributes to the group success. They reveal it is due to the fact that they seem to be meticulous, and they tend to consider all facets of a proposed idea to make a decision.
On the other hand, although group conflicts to some extent result in desired outcomes, they should be dealt with inasmuch as they may become destructive and disintegrate the group. In fact, should incompatibility among group members be intensified, its detrimental consequences would eventuate to failure or even collapse. Therefore, all members are required to be aware of how to react in a dilemma. By and large, on account of the grounds subsequently mentioned in the previous paragraphs, advantages of confliction outweigh its disadvantages.
In conclusion, a group gains substantial benefits from confliction, included acquiring skills for its members and receiving innovative ideas for its project, which is eventually conducive to a successful team. Moreover, those members proposing different ideas are believed to be capable of handling arguments and even predicaments rather than others. Hence, it causes the level of the group’s abilities to grow remarkably.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, as for, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2605.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4158004158 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19094785989 2.67179642975 119% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561330561331 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3672087607 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.409090909 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8636363636 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 5.45110844103 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296599163162 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937199051383 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561158473426 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180110426752 0.150856017488 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699183481991 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 86.8835125448 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.