This topic raise the controverstial issue of whether national governments should stop funding art projects when the employment level of the country is low and the citizens are starving. Indisputably, we have experienced from history that art thrives under such conditions of hardships. Nevertheless, the main priority of the government should be to look after the wellbeing of its citizens. Thus, I would generally disagree with the opinion that government funding of art even during the low points of the nation is necessary, and would argue that those funds are better put to use when creating jobs and feeding the citizens.
First of all, I would like to point out that the presemt wellbeing of the citizens of a nation is of much more importance than supporting art projects. To illustrate, let us look at the example of the British colonial rule in India. The British government stole food from the native citizens of the country and sold it back to India at an inflated price, thus, looting the resources of the country. Using such resources, they lived a lavish lifestyle and build some magnificent pieces of art in India, Victoria Memorial for example. But as a result, the citizens were dying because of starvation and set back the progress of the nation in the long run.
Furthermore, more people will be willing to pursue their passion and become an artist if there is good enough employment in the country. Specifically, if we look at United States of America as an example, we can see that how flourishing market and proper funding of science projects saw the rise of numerous Nobel laureates from that country. People want a confirmation that even if their pursue of their passion in art fails for some reason, they can still get a regular job and live a life like an average joe. Such is possible when the employment of the country is good. Thus, it is necessary that countries focus more on providing job opportunites to their citizens.
Finally, it has to be admitted that art is also a form of portrayal of human struggle during the time of its production. This is especially true if we look at the example of French New Wave, which was the trend in French Cinema of 1950s. The purpose of French New Wave was to provide a voice to the depraved public suffering from post World War II. During that time, the already existing directors were making movies about lavish lifestyles in a war torn France. But, then came few young men like Goddard and Fellini and started this trend of providing a platform for the poor to speak through cinema.
In conclusion, although it is necessary for government to support art projects to at all times in order to evolve the culture, however, the priority of well being of the citizens should be much more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'raises'.
Suggestion: raises
This topic raise the controverstial issue of whether nat...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2294.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7891440501 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62890399144 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517745302714 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6729607423 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.7 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.95 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.21951772744 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177908641198 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0491299916876 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436074225483 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980902756367 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510388966788 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.