No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
We live in 21st century where major scientific advancements are being made regularly in every field. The prompt positively states that interdomain knowledge is necessary for a field to make significant advancement. It is quite evident by the contributions being made in several fields like AI, Economics , Medicine , etc. I would like to argue in the favour of the statement in the prompt.
The chief reason for my view is because of the fact that interdomain knowledge is necessary to work in any field. For instance, Robotics is a newly booming field which requires the knowledge of Mechanical engineering, Electronics Engineering and Artificial Intelligence. It is one of the most researched fields in the tech industry. Without this knowledge , it would not have been possible to create human-like robots which interact with humans like a human. Sara, the first robot citizen in the world is an example for this.
Another example is the advancements in Medicine for instance. In Feb 2020, Covid-19 was declared as a world health emergency by United Nations. The entire world went into lockdown which affected the livelihood of a number of people across the globe. Death rates due to covid-19 saw an exponential rise in mid-August 2020 especially in India. Scientists from various fields such as Nanotechnology, Virology, and Medicine came together to combat this situation by developing a vaccine that successfully helped in stemming the death rates. This would not have been possible without the help of scientists from various domains.
Even the tech giant, Elon Musk has accepted that the tremendous success of all his companies working in different domains like Paypal which is an e-wallet, Tesla which sells electric cars, Spacex which designs rockets, etc is due to the cross-domain knowledge that he had.
Hence, the proverb “ Jack of all trade, Master of none” no longer holds true.For a field to advance, it is necessary to incorporate knowledge and experience from other fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 304, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ade in several fields like AI, Economics , Medicine , etc. I would like to argue i...
^^
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ral fields like AI, Economics , Medicine , etc. I would like to argue in the favou...
^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_THE_FACT_THAT[1]
Message: This phrase is redundant. Use simply 'because'.
Suggestion: because
...mpt. The chief reason for my view is because of the fact that interdomain knowledge is necessary to w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he tech industry. Without this knowledge , it would not have been possible to crea...
^^
Line 9, column 78, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...e, Master of none” no longer holds true.For a field to advance, it is necessary to ...
^^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ledge and experience from other fields.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23602484472 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89259573034 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593167701863 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.376172779 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1764705882 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.82352941176 5.21951772744 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25839771873 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076104284246 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054177537944 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138302031466 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429376496087 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.