Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress.
It is said that the great scientist and inventor Thomas Edison was able to make an electric blub in one thousand one attempts, he was failed thousand times. Here, the author conteds the discovery or progress is made only through mistakes. I strongly agree with the writer's contention. Restrospective to the history, mistakes are the great foundation for progress and discovery.
First of all, mistakes in every realms of life are almost inevitable. For supporting example, let's see the progress of space X, an american Rocket company. Initially it failed three times while flying rocket into the space. But later it even able to land it again on the suface of the earth, which was not even able to done by NASA. Here, there were mistakes, but team recognizes it and immue to eradicate mistakes, later in forth flight, they were able to fly in into the space from the surface of earth. This is not only the case, one of my friend was not able to pass a GRE exam, was trying relentlessy, in his third attempt, he finnally secured the required score.
Second of all, let's see an example of a very eminent inventor Edison, he had tried thousand times in order to invent an electric bulb. Only through, his obstinate passion, it was possible to invent electic bulb. Not a single great thing is possible to invent or discover without mistakes. For another supporting example, one can see an example of President Bide, he previously ran for a presidency, however he was not elected. Later he find out mistakes and his weakness, in this election which was held few months ago in US, he won with significant votes.
Third of all, this statement is not applicable only in education and scientific inventions. We all have seen a child, initially when he learns to walk, he don't able to stay straight in his first attempt. After doing several attempts to stay and walk, he finally walks, but even the walk is not well initially. Through continuous practice and after making several mistakes, even a child learns to walk.
In sum, it is true that only through mistakes, progress and discovery is made. Without mistakes, it is not possible to move ahead in any realms of life. Human being are rife with lot of mistakes, it is the basic foundation for success. So, I agree with the author's contention.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-30 | Technoblade | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | s.sim | 58 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | SadiaIqtidar | 58 | view |
| 2021-02-27 | Sudan Devkota | 50 | view |
| 2021-02-25 | deadFish | 65 | view |
- Technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the qulity of life 100
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 75
- The council of Maple County concerned about the county s becoming overdeveloped is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county But the council is also concerned that such a restriction by limiting the 50
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...ne thousand one attempts, he was failed thousand times. Here, the author conteds the di...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...thousand times. Here, the author conteds the discovery or progress is made only t...
^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...ugh mistakes. I strongly agree with the writers contention. Restrospective to the histo...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n his third attempt, he finnally secured the required score. Second of all, l...
^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...y eminent inventor Edison, he had tried thousand times in order to invent an electric bu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'finds'.
Suggestion: finds
...y, however he was not elected. Later he find out mistakes and his weakness, in this ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d, initially when he learns to walk, he dont able to stay straight in his first atte...
^^^^
Line 9, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rns to walk. In sum, it is true that only through mistakes, progress and disc...
^^
Line 9, column 259, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ation for success. So, I agree with the authors contention.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, third, well, while, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.4196629213 8% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7475 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5302062663 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8296963879 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5652173913 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3913043478 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91304347826 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193394851085 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631891380153 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999174733659 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116741131114 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690922066078 0.0667264976115 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.