A work of art can indeed be deemed meritorious when it is understood by the masses. As I shall argue in this essay, even though the merit of some works can only be understood by their specialists, it is most often the case that we are only able to measure the merit of a work of art by means of the public’s appreciation of the work, which in turn is dependant on them understanding the art in question.
The way we measure an object’s educational value, or its merit, is at stake in this discussion. It is undoubtedly true that an object’s merit can most often deduced from the public’s reaction to it. That is, if the general people were to highly appreciate a work of art or a film, then we can easily claim that the work in question is considered meritorious. When taking this factor into account, that a work’s merit can most often be deduced through the extent of the public’s appreciation of the work, it is inevitable that a work of an art or a film has to be understandable and thereby appreciated by the public in order to be deemed meritorious in value.
In addition, it should be said that the aforementioned method of measuring the merit of a work of art is in fact objective in nature. That is to say that it is only when a work of art is understandable or communicable to the people does it have a true educational value. Indeed, if a work of art is too abstract, then it could be argued that the artist simply lacks the skills to communicate abstract concepts in his or her field in simple terms, such that the general public can understand. Such a skill is required in every specialized field, whose knowledge the general public is unable to access until a meritorious specialist is able to water down abstract concepts. Accordingly, it is clear that a work of art needs to be understandable to the public to have merit
Nevertheless, it is still true that some works of art are meritorious in nature even though they remain incomprehensible to the masses. The merit of these works can only be deduced by the specialists who are able to appreciate the subtleties that make up the work. In such cases, the contents of the actual work matters more than the massses’ reaction to it; however this is a rarity.
Overall, this essay has argued that the most objective criteria for measuring the merit of a work of art is through the public’s reaction to the work in question. This is because a work of art can be deemed to be of educational value primarily when it is able to communicate abstract concepts in simple terms, which ultimately means it has to be understood by the masses in order to be deemed meritorious.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...reciation of the work, which in turn is dependant on them understanding the art in questi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...er field in simple terms, such that the general public can understand. Such a skill is require...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 566, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... specialized field, whose knowledge the general public is unable to access until a meritorious...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, as to, in addition, in fact, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60334029228 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02311156634 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.375782881002 0.4932671777 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 700.2 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.7481397359 60.3974514979 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.0 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9333333333 23.4991977007 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22321260764 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957806746296 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557387643731 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154010768446 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392048241757 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.