Peers can have an influence on the behavior of a child. This influence can be negative or positive. Is peer pressure mostly beneficial? Why or why not?
A man is known by the company he keeps. Children’s behavior is easily affected by people around them, especially their close friends. Proponents say that a child can better develop thanks to their peer pressure, whereas the opponents claim it to be harmful as the child learn bad behaviors. From my perspective, I do believe that pressure from peers mostly beneficially influences a child’s manner because he can learn his friends’ good aspects and compete to be the most outstanding among the group.
First of all, various great attributes from friends can be elicited to learn. Each member in a group usually has a different background, which leads to different standpoints on the same matter. Instead of experiencing that problem, which may be hazardous, a child can just listen to his friends’ stories and compare them to his one to come up with a conclusion for himself. This can still apply even the child gets older. Since I came to the university, I have learned a lot from my friends such as skills, learning tools, points of view, all of which I often do not have time to self-experience.
Besides, peer pressure encourages competitiveness among a companion group. Competitiveness has proved to be one of the noteworthy means for development. Children’s ego nowadays is stronger compared with that in the past; therefore, fair competitiveness seems to be an indispensable element for a child to develop. This has been proved by the actual commercial state. Due to the fact that enterprises investing in the same industry need to always apply the up-to-date features to their production or marketing campaigns in order to make them outstanding, which ones are opinionated will gradually straggle.
Some critics of peer pressure argue that children learn bad manners better than good ones. In their view, children are so naive that they cannot differentiate between good and bad behaviors. In other words, a child behaves what he observes frequently. While it may be true that companion pressure has the capacity to make the child negatively develop, we should not draw the conclusion that he should avoid friendships as a result. Educational experts have stated that the most determining factor in the behavioral growth of a child is his family, the closest to him. In other words, whoever a child gets into the companionship with, his behaviors can still positively develop if his family nurture him appropriately.
All in all, engaging in peer pressure has important merits. It can help a child easily learn good lessons without taking risks and fairly compete for better development. Parents should encourage both companionship and peer pressure to get their children well-prepared for their future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-12 | dangchan21 | 75 | view |
- Many people in today s world are still suffering poor sanitation and waste management What problem does it cause and what are some solutions to this 78
- Many people in today s world are still suffering poor sanitation and waste management What are the causes and effects of this reality 78
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries
- Forests produce fresh oxygen and participate in regulating climate But every year tree cover of our planet is lessening due to deforestation What are the primary causes of deforestation To what results may it lead 84
- Children in many places are suffering child abuse What are the effects of it and what can be the solutions to solve the problem 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.6327345309 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 28.8173652695 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2291.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 443.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17155756208 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.56307096286 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0130916714 2.78398813304 108% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 204.123752495 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541760722348 0.468620217663 116% => OK
syllable_count: 680.4 705.55239521 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.5412904408 57.8364921388 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6086956522 119.503703932 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2608695652 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.39130434783 5.70786347227 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307938194154 0.218282227539 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806940148009 0.0743258471296 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648430027882 0.0701772020484 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170704494577 0.128457276422 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639103172649 0.0628817314937 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 98.500998004 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.