Technology is a growing norm in today’s day and age. We can see ourselves encompassed by it. We see it everywhere we turn. If it weren’t for technology we would not have these gadgets, appliances, etc. that makes our lives so easy today. Surely, it was someone’s thought to make all those things possible. So, in my opinion, technology does not impede humans’ ability to think but rather makes the human mind more curious.
There have been many accomplishments over the years of people creating wonders through these technological advances. Technology made possible the vehicular transformation from victorias to automobiles, travel to new destinations via an aircraft or a train. Over the years many unfathomable mathematical problems have been solved by super computers which were on someone’s behalf a great invention and it has led to various scientific discoveries. Technology widens the horizon of people who invest in it wanting them to know and learn more and more.
However, as we have incorporated technology in our lives it has made us indolent. Everything we want should come to us has become our policy. From ordering food to online shopping everything comes to our doorstep nowadays. Moreover, the electronic gadgets like cell phones, computers and video games have made the kids of today more sedentary. This really affects their physical growth and is a reason for growing medical conditions like obesity and heart problems in the youth.
All in all, reliance on Technology does not infect human minds and their capacity to think, but it surely does make the human race more lax. On the other hand one could not contemplate their life without technology today.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, really, so, as to, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 275.0 442.535393258 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20727272727 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.55969084622 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98253649884 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629090909091 0.4932671777 128% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2809898035 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.5555555556 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 23.4991977007 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38888888889 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15827658817 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446883170094 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532749678445 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0964344426399 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358030390573 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.