As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Techonological developement have advanced human brains rather than deteriorating it.
The developement of technology had opened a whole new world for human beings to learn.
Knowledge is not restricted to a particular region or certain university books. It is accessible to everyone through internet.
A person sitting in any corner of world can learn and think about any topic intrest an make significant contribution to the field due to techonological advancement.
Techonology have made humans lazy but not stupid. As there is continious development new problems arise accordingly.
Few centuries ago humans have to spend their most of the day doing daily chores but today, they think of economics, science etc.
Humans have also made robots to adapt to particular situations and make decisions themselves.
So, how one can say, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate?
Humans have advanced to such a extent never thought before. CRISPR, Research on gene editing to cure incurable deseases like cancer, AIDS etc
are the examples of human brain advancement withn techonology. Finally, there are more new fields of knowledge sill to be opened for humans to think
In all actuality, I think it is more probable that our bodies will surely deteriorate long before our minds do in any significant amount.
Who can't say that technology has made us lazier, but that's the key word, lazy, not stupid.
The ever increasing amount of technology that we incorporate into our daily lives makes people think and learn every day, possibly more than ever before.
Our abilities to think, learn, philosophize, etc. may even reach limits never dreamed of before by average people.
Using technology to solve problems will continue to help us realize our potential as a human race.
If you think about it, using technology to solve more complicating problems gives humans a chance to expand their thinking and learning, opening up whole new worlds for many people.
Many of these people are glad for the chance to expand their horizons by learning more, going to new places, and trying new things.
If it wasn't for the invention of new technological devices, I wouldn't be sitting at this computer trying to philosophize about technology.
It would be extremely hard for children in much poorer countries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the internet.
Think what an impact the printing press, a technologically superior mackine at the time, had on the ability of the human race to learn and think.
Right now we are seeing a golden age of technology, using it all the time during our every day lives.
When we get up there's instant coffee and the microwave and all these great things that help us get ready for our day.
But we aren't allowing our minds to deteriorate by using them, we are only making things easier for ourselves and saving time for other important things in our days.
Going off to school or work in our cars instead of a horse and buggy.
Think of the brain power and genius that was used to come up with that single invention that has changed the way we move across this globe.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 85, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...learn and think about any topic intrest an make significant contribution to the fi...
^^
Line 6, column 51, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y have made humans lazy but not stupid. As there is continious development new pro...
^^
Line 11, column 30, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...iorate? Humans have advanced to such a extent never thought before. CRISPR, Re...
^
Line 11, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...incurable deseases like cancer, AIDS etc are the examples of human brain advancem...
^^^
Line 17, column 5, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nds do in any significant amount. Who cant say that technology has made us lazier,...
^^^^
Line 17, column 54, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...that technology has made us lazier, but thats the key word, lazy, not stupid. The e...
^^^^^
Line 24, column 8, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... places, and trying new things. If it wasnt for the invention of new technological ...
^^^^^
Line 24, column 64, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...vention of new technological devices, I wouldnt be sitting at this computer trying to p...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 100, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...tries to learn and think for themselves with out the invention of the internet. Think ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 29, column 17, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...g our every day lives. When we get up theres instant coffee and the microwave and al...
^^^^^^
Line 30, column 8, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...help us get ready for our day. But we arent allowing our minds to deteriorate by us...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, if, may, so, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2649.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 530.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99811320755 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79809637944 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69363726906 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530188679245 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 828.9 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8068986124 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6071428571 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.89285714286 5.21951772744 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.97078651685 503% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324454240229 0.243740707755 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817015270308 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839668977776 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914025472797 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808657074571 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.