There is no doubt in accepting that the technologies has made our mundane life interesting and easy as well. The idea for innovate a new technologies is mostly drawn from our daily life requirement again to make it easy, so that we can put our more focus on the important things rather than wasting time on this mundane stuff. Sometimes, these technologies tend to make human being more dependant on itself which results into creating more gap between themselves. But, this gap will again push innovaters to close by inventing a new technologies.
Firstly, I agree that exess use of technologies has created communication gap as well as the interactions between people. For example, almost everyone own a mobile phone nowadays which is so salient, involiving and frought with so many new things. We, humand, spend so much time on the mobile phones even when we are surrounded by many people. But, on the other hand, the introduction of mobile phones has been a bon to human kind. Now, everyone is just a call away from us. Just using few technologies, we can see face and interact with people who are at housands of km from us.
Furthermore, the introduction of new technologies like oven, cars, alarms and electricity etc. has never affected the way people think about each other. For example, few centuaries ago, when travel from one country to another was next to impossible and ,if possible, take several days or months. But, as the new technologies like cycles, bike, car, ships and flight has introduced it became possible for us to meet new people and culture. And also instead of wasting time for doing these tedious job, this time can be useful and soent with the loved ones.
Finally, the sole purpose of introduction is to solve a problem, human beings problems. If a job, which requires human attention, can be performed by a technology, will always save sometime for one which can always be spend in inventing a new techonologies which can further solve a new problem.
In the end, it can be easy for one to think that technologies has thwarted interaction between people. But, when one thinksfrom all the angle, it is introduced for humans to make our life simpler.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'technology'?
Suggestion: technology
...sy as well. The idea for innovate a new technologies is mostly drawn from our daily life req...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...hnologies tend to make human being more dependant on itself which results into creating m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 534, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'technology'?
Suggestion: technology
... innovaters to close by inventing a new technologies. Firstly, I agree that exess use of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 253, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ry to another was next to impossible and ,if possible, take several days or months...
^^
Line 8, column 209, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put between 'be' and 'spend'.
Suggestion: be always spend
... always save sometime for one which can always be spend in inventing a new techonologies which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, no doubt, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1818.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83510638298 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73908798467 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539893617021 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2254206561 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6842105263 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207200853892 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630473161935 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490247621189 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116943966917 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406210573365 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.