As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Reliance on technology does not lead to reduction in thinking capability of human beings, rather it develops the brain to solve much more arduous tasks that would otherwise be impossible to do. So, I do not agree to the given statement that relying more on technology to solve problems makes people less able to think by themselves.
Recent advancements in technology have helped people in focusing more on new and significant tasks than being stuck with the old ones.Performing time consuming tasks such as complex calculations, solving mathematical equations, sending messages at really fast speeds etcetera has allowed humans to use their knowledge and experience to come up with new ideas and leave the calculation part to the computer. After all, technological achievements have been made solely because of the extraordinary capability of humans to think logically. Programming computers, for example, has had positive impact on children who begin coding at a very young age; it involves building logic and putting in the computer to simplify convoluted tasks. As Steve Jobs once said,”A human being with a computer is the most efficient animal on the planet”. People who are fluent in using todays technologies have significantly better logical and mathematical abilities.
Reliance on technology has increased because of the constantly improving functionalities of it. If we were to use the first digital computer made by Alan Turing today, its functioning and use would be esoteric. The goal of developing technologies is to augment ease of use which requires critical thinking by human beings. Transitioning from gasoline based cars to electric cars, for example, comes with a lot of difficult problems that forces its makers to go out of the box and come up unprecedented techniques for building it. Even the online education system has increased the number of people that have access to knowledge; this has ensued in more people becoming capable to think for themselves. Technology adapts to the intelligence level of whoever uses it and fosters the development of their brains and helps them in overcoming their limits.
Therefore, I believe that technology and analytical thinking go parallel to each other and that relying more on technology is certainly good for people in general. Technology influences every aspect of out thought process and rewires our mind to make sound decisions in all aspects of our life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Performing
...asks than being stuck with the old ones.Performing time consuming tasks such as complex ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'speeds'' or 'speed's'?
Suggestion: speeds'; speed's
...ations, sending messages at really fast speeds etcetera has allowed humans to use thei...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...onvoluted tasks. As Steve Jobs once said,'A human being with a computer is the mo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 913, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'bettered', 'welled'.
Suggestion: bettered; welled
... todays technologies have significantly better logical and mathematical abilities. ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nking go parallel to each other and that relying more on technology is certainly ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, really, so, therefore, after all, for example, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2059.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 388.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30670103093 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02885277695 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585051546392 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.5289512142 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.266666667 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8666666667 23.4991977007 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233676360294 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0813496773196 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672270575551 0.0758088955206 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15304079787 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421430305719 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.