Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Education is of vital importance for a student in developing his or her career and good educational institutes play the most significant role in laying out the path that is right for a student. But the given statement that educational institutes have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing careers in which they are unlikely to succeed cannot be agreed with.
First of all, it is highly likely that the educational institutes may turn out to be poor critiques of the student's potential while trying to dissuade him or her. A wise man once said, "Constant failures and struggles are nothing but stepping stones toward success". During this process of struggle, if the institutes dissuade the students due to lack of results, the students might never be able realise their potential and passion in life. Albert Einstein, for example, was considered a lazy dreamer by his teachers and they said that he would never amount to much. But after years of hard work, he came to be known as one of the greatest physicists of all time. Judgement by an institute cannot be treated as a sound method for determining a student's future. Rather, the educational institutes should assist a student in overcoming his or her limits by persuading them to work harder.
Second of all, becoming successful requires years and years of hard work. Sometimes, teachers or professors may become doubtful of the capabilities of the student but this does not provide a valid reason for dissuading their disciples. Another example of such a case is Michael Jordan, the basketball player. He was cut from his high school basketball team because of his poor performance. Later, a term,"Greatest of all time" was coined for him and he is now considered as a symbol of success who also received the Presidential Medal of Freedom from former president, Mr. Barrack Obama. The teacher who cut him from the team would never have thought how great he would become. Professors and mentors should be strict with students but not dissuasive.
Third, it is the responsibility of the educational institutes to provide the students with options to decide from. A student's penchant for a field of study can be understood by giving him or her the freedom to choose. Educational institutes should foster the skills of students in which they are likely to succeed while still supporting them to change their field if they so desire. A supporting hand from the teachers would prove to be more advantageous for the students in the long run.
Therefore, it is not correct to say that educational institutes should dissuade students from pursing a field that is not likely to make them successful because life is full of twists and turns and one does not know what the future might hold. The main conclusion is that a student's success depends on the work he or she puts in, not on the ambiguous judgement of the educational institutes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 66
- "A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual's levels of stimulation. The study showed that in stimulating situations (such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey), firstborn infant monkeys 26
- Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing 83
- The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 87
- "Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twic 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 570, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...nd they said that he would never amount to much. But after years of hard work, he ...
^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...e of his poor performance. Later, a term,'Greatest of all time' was coined f...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...students with options to decide from. A students penchant for a field of study can be un...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... might hold. The main conclusion is that a students success depends on the work h...
^^
Line 9, column 276, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ht hold. The main conclusion is that a students success depends on the work he or she p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2438.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 491.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96537678208 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70728369723 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90332419822 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.482688391039 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9958675869 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.818181818 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3181818182 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04545454545 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253640932366 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0819168079714 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107476203476 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177272015942 0.150359130593 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115131437462 0.0667264976115 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.