A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Most of the schools make their students study the same national curriculum, but upto a certain grade. The necessity of providing flexibility in the choice of subjects arises a long time before students enter college. So, the given statement of making all students study the same national curriculum is not appropriate for the students at all.
First of all, the kind of colleges that students intend to join may select only that sample of students who have studied a specific set of subjects. Many colleges conduct exams in those particular fields of study for the selection of students. Studying the same national curriculum may render the a student ineligible for even giving the exams if specific subjects are not included in the curriculum. For example, in India, the most prestigious university for pursuing engineering is the Indian Institute of Technology and , it does not allow students who do not have Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics as their subject in the grades, eleventh and twelfth. The national curriculum may not always consist of the subjects a student wants to study in the future. So, it becomes imperative to take into the account the interests of a student in general, or otherwise a lot many years of his/her would squander off because of the unreasonable rules of academic education in the country.
Second of all, in certain fields like Science, it becomes necessary to hone one's skills right from about eighth grade if one wants to succeed in this field. Giving this opportunity when students enter college would be too late for them. In many cases, this does not allow one to find his/her passions in life. Being left behind in one's choice of study may even prove to be mentally perturbing for the student. In the growing new world, opportunities for students are immense relative to the past 2 decades, therefore, students should not be confined by the rules of education, rather it should let them free.
Third of all, every student is different in his/her capability to understand things. The national curriculum may contain subjects that may be esoteric in nature, this scheme would then seem to be biased in favour of those who understand the subjects. Making people study something they cannot comprehend is a gigantic waste of time. Take a student, for example, who has no penchant for the field commerce and is passionate about arts only. Such a student would not be able to realise his/her potential unless groomed from the beginning. Albert Einstein, one of the smartest people to ever live, had no interest in subjects other than physics and mathematics. One could imagine what would have happened had he not been allowed to study physics as a part of the national curriculum. So, the study of national curriculum may be significant only upto a certain point, but dragging the same things till the onset of college is not a prolific way to produce educated people.
To sum up, providing flexibility to students to chose what they want and not confining them should begin from a long time before college. This would help them focus solely on their field of study and also prepare them for college. Correct direction would be provided to them in if a nation makes change in its rules for providing education to its people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...the same national curriculum may render the a student ineligible for even giving the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 523, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s the Indian Institute of Technology and , it does not allow students who do not h...
^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...e Science, it becomes necessary to hone ones skills right from about eighth grade if...
^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... passions in life. Being left behind in ones choice of study may even prove to be me...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, for example, in general, kind of, first of all, in many cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 83.0 58.6224719101 142% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2721.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 552.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92934782609 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84713113593 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61152337681 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476449275362 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 863.1 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9344924866 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.84 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.08 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.21951772744 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234509430838 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807971396468 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568439065732 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159732887503 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548785294672 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.