Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position

Essay topics:

Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.

Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Preservation of nature has become the most exigent issue in today's scenario. Due to lack of natural resources, the present situation of people in the world keeps on becoming poor. So, the act in which nations would pass laws to preserve any of the remaining wilderness areas in their natural state would surely prove to be advantageous, even if these could be developed for economic gain.

First of all, the wilderness areas are home to some of the most unique species on the planet. In the past few years, due to increased destruction of these areas, some of the species are on the brink of extinction or have become extinct. For example, in India, the population of lions has drastically decreased because most of their natural habitats have been destroyed for monetary gains. Perturbation of the wilderness areas never turns out to be good for the native animals. In addition to fauna, these areas are also home to large variety of flora. The plant life, that play a vital role in developing medicines, producing food and maintaining the ecological balance also get destroyed when humans interfere. As Steve Irwin has said,"If we can teach people about wildlife, they will be touched". Wildlife is unquestionably more important than economic gains.

Second of all, due to our lack of concern for nature, the need for ecological balance has overpowered the need for economic gains. After all, the source of all economic gain are these wilderness areas. Countries like Australia, that preserve their wildlife, provide significantly better habitats for the animals living there. This is also the main reason for the existence of such a rich variety of animal and plant species. The economic gains have long been given more significance over these wilderness areas and modern cities have been constructed over them, due to which climatic changes have ensued. These changes in the climate have also lead to major catastrophes like the forest fires in California etcetera.

Nations have a responsibility to pass laws that preserve these areas for the betterment of humans in the long run. As Paul Oxton has said,"Only when the last of animal horns, tusks, skins and bones have been sold, will humans realise that money cannot buy back wildlife". It is important to understand that the need for economic growth cannot overtake the need for preservation of wildlife. It is better to leave these specie rich areas and let natural selection do what is right.

To sum up, as a society, we need to become more careful about how we use the wilderness areas and its wildlife because a balance has to be maintained between use natural resources and preserving those resources. This would also foster the growth of various animal and plant species which is good for the planet as a whole. The main conclusion that can be drawn here is that, if . we

Votes
Average: 5.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-10-23 Sabarnakha 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Shreyas97 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: VERY_UNIQUE[1]
Message: Use simply 'unique'.
Suggestion: unique
...ilderness areas are home to some of the most unique species on the planet. In the past few ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...o increased destruction of these areas, some of the species are on the brink of extinction ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 736, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...umans interfere. As Steve Irwin has said,'If we can teach people about wildlife, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 645, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
... These changes in the climate have also lead to major catastrophes like the forest f...
^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
... in the long run. As Paul Oxton has said,'Only when the last of animal horns, tus...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this specie' or 'these species'?
Suggestion: this specie; these species
...tion of wildlife. It is better to leave these specie rich areas and let natural selection do...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...usion that can be drawn here is that, if . we
^^
Line 9, column 381, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...on that can be drawn here is that, if . we
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, after all, as for, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2389.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99790794979 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72427790574 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485355648536 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 761.4 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3118178593 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5416666667 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95833333333 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352395263821 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997023374384 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102565795026 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216603809963 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875566898906 0.0667264976115 131% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.