As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The writer of the issue claims that people’s ability to think for themselves will debilitate as they rely more and more on technology. This is a contention with which I generally agree for the following reasons.
First, by relying on technology to solve problems, humans do not see the necessity to think over various problems and issues they are faced with. The human brain, like other organs of our body, needs to work in order to continue to function. If we do not force our brains to work, it becomes inactive overtime and thus, it loses its ability to function efficiently. When this occurs, the brain is forced to always rely on external sources to provide solutions and therefore, humans lose their ability to think for themselves entirely.
Furthermore, there are some problems that are better solved by humans than means of technology. Robots and computers are not equipped with the ability to learn, and thus, they lack the privilege of imagination. Therefore, these means cannot find the optimal way to solve each of human life problems. Moreover, if humans rely on these means to solve every problem they are faced with, the problems will not be solved earlierly. Also, imagnition is another skill that can be nurture through contemplating and use of the brain. If people rely on computers and technology to solve the problems, they will not think. Thus, they lose their own imagination over time as well, and the human civilization will certainly fall in the near future since better solutions to human problem will be extinct due to lack of thinking and computer’s capability to solve the problem.
However, we should not disregard the impact of using technology in solving the problems humans are incapable to solve. There are numerous issues in engineering, architecture, and even social studies which were unconquerable by humans, yet advent of technology helped people to find solutions to these problems. Without technology and computers, humans are not able to apply proposed methods which supposedly solve this type of problems, and thus, efficiently exploit the resources to overcome the barriers in various aspects of their lives.
In essence, using means of technology certainly helps people to overcome the problems which were supposed invincible in the past. Yet, applying technology in all of the problems worsen the human’s ability to think, and thus leads to human fall in the end.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 158, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...n the past. Yet, applying technology in all of the problems worsen the human's abilit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, even so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13602015113 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7415865221 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491183879093 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8948178851 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.277777778 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0555555556 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411766584489 0.243740707755 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139257357513 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120185179266 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239892896645 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767073408451 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.