As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The statement contends that as the people rely more on technology to solve their problems, the ability to of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. It can be agreed that the technology helps humans to solve their problems like make the transport quick and efficient; increases the medical facilities; providing the transparency over the internet and intranet. But at the same time the counter statement that the ability of humans to think for themselves will deteriorate is indefensible.
On the contrary technology helps ameliorate the thinking ability by profoundly providing with the loads of data to analyse; the technology helped astronomers for their ventures for launching linar mission, mar missiion, it got them to think hardly about what the specifications might be needed for such an expedition. The technological improvements are remarkable in the field of telecommunications; it helped humans think to enter the era of
smartphones from the landlines. It can also be quoted that the technology always helps giving birth to a better version of itself.
Technology brings the best of the abilities of the thinking of the humans to bring out the best so that the best technology currently gets obsolete by the further modifications on the present version. It is the technology thathelps to find our way through GPS but its human thinking that it can also be used to find the shortest route to reach the respective destination. Technology has provided with such pathways where the humans are using their thinking ability to make it better like Artificial Intelligence, Satellite Tracking, Space and Time Travel; which are fields to which the research is still ongoing.
As each coin has two sides the technology applications also causes some humans to give up thinking and rely only on the technology even for the most basic logical applications such as mathematics, the statistics shows that the Remembering capabilities of the humans has been remarkably decreased people dosent remembers most of the basic telephone numbers that they connects to very frequently. Handmade decoratives and ornaments are the things of the past.
To sum up the contention that the technology deteriorates the thinking abilities of the humans is indefensible as on the contrary it overwhelms the thinking abilities to a great extent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'think'.
Suggestion: hardly think
...r mission, mar missiion, it got them to think hardly about what the specifications might be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... helped humans think to enter the era of smartphones from the landlines. It can a...
^^^
Line 4, column 88, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to give' or 'give'.
Suggestion: to give; give
...quoted that the technology always helps giving birth to a better version of itself. ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o which the research is still ongoing. As each coin has two sides the technolo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 368, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'connect'
Suggestion: connect
...f the basic telephone numbers that they connects to very frequently. Handmade decorative...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'such as', 'on the contrary', 'to sum up', 'to a great extent']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249370277078 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.16120906801 0.157235817809 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0780856423174 0.0880659088768 89% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0453400503778 0.0497285424764 91% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0478589420655 0.0444667217837 108% => OK
Prepositions: 0.123425692695 0.12292977631 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0352644836272 0.0406280797675 87% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.08063165616 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0478589420655 0.030933414821 155% => OK
Particles: 0.00755667506297 0.0016655270985 454% => OK
Determiners: 0.136020151134 0.0997080785238 136% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0151133501259 0.0249443105267 61% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0100755667506 0.0148568991511 68% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2356.0 2732.02544248 86% => OK
No of words: 374.0 452.878318584 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.29946524064 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.58838876751 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.363636363636 0.366273622748 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291443850267 0.280924506359 104% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.251336898396 0.200843997647 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.187165775401 0.132149295362 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08063165616 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494652406417 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 52.7672155369 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6194690265 58% => OK
Sentence length: 31.1666666667 23.380412469 133% => OK
Sentence length SD: 87.345896043 59.4972553346 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 196.333333333 141.124799967 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1666666667 23.380412469 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 60.3110516934 51.4728631049 117% => OK
Elegance: 1.60396039604 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493314228445 0.391690518653 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.160381860083 0.123202303941 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0439677585643 0.077325440228 57% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.750885630174 0.547984918172 137% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159392987447 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.271668408036 0.161403998019 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168774741979 0.0892212321368 189% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.481838903861 0.385218514788 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0928312452156 0.0692045440612 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316181447642 0.275328986314 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142366469991 0.0653680567796 218% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88274336283 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.