In 21st century, technology is omnipresent in our life, and we are over relying on it for performing our mundane chores. Given statement relates heavily dependence on technology negatively with human cognitive and analytical ability. Greater exposure to technology is surely deteriorating man's thinking ability because humans are using brain lesser and lesser for performing daily activities.
Firstly, overuse of technology is degrading human computational and decision making abilities due strong influence of smart devices on such processes. Currently students can not perform basic mathematical calculation without using calculators. Currently travellers can not find their destinations without using GPS devices. Above all are indicators for loss our computational and decision making abilities.
Finally, technology is also reducing our social skills due to extra indulgence in social networking sites. Now a days, humans are spending numerous hours daily on social networking sites. This is limiting their face to face contact with communication with other people. Therefore, there is less awareness about social skills such as eye contact, listening, face reading, and understanding others emotions. It is also reducing sense of community within people. Due to overuse of technology, humans are spending couple of hours daily alone leading to lack of social skills.
In conclusion, there are more shortcomings of technology compared to its strength for normal man. So, we need to use technology more thoughtfully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: NOW_A_DAYS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nowadays'?
Suggestion: Nowadays
... indulgence in social networking sites. Now a days, humans are spending numerous hours dai...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a day' or simply 'days'?
Suggestion: a day; days
...ulgence in social networking sites. Now a days, humans are spending numerous hours dai...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.6327345309 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 13.6137724551 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 28.8173652695 42% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 2260.96107784 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 224.0 441.139720559 51% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87946428571 5.12650576532 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 4.56307096286 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03718123695 2.78398813304 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 204.123752495 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611607142857 0.468620217663 131% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 705.55239521 60% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59920159681 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 22.8473053892 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.8771040669 57.8364921388 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.8 119.503703932 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9333333333 23.324526521 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.70786347227 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151800777088 0.218282227539 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499694557227 0.0743258471296 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454488267993 0.0701772020484 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101201750624 0.128457276422 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588716729068 0.0628817314937 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.89 48.3550499002 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.23 12.5979740519 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.32208582834 118% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 98.500998004 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.1389221557 68% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.