As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The above suggestion is not based on logical grounds. As it represents the idea of using technology to solve our problems is degrading our thinking. The thought is similar to an army general making a plan and using his/her troops to execute is deteriorating his thinking by assigning them duties.
Firstly, it is very important to use all the available resources to complete the task in the best manner possible. For example- if we need to study for an exam then student needs to decide which source is most effective for him like consulting a teacher (Conventional Method), online education (Newer Method) or self-study. Any source can be suitable but that does not effect his capabilities. It sharpens them it teaches us to think what is better for us and how. Likewise, an architect making a blueprint is on his own is just going to make his job more difficult and is not related to his thinking abilities.
Secondly, to analyse any situation clearly, there are two major hindrances, that is language barriers and other is lack of knowledge related to the subject, and we all know that technology in the form of Google, helps us to get rid of both of them. Therefore it supports our brain to work in the right direction by providing it specific material regarding the project.
Now, the people who are in the support of the above statement would say that our decisions are manipulated by the social media, online news, etc. Thus, they cloud our judgement. These people have definitely forgot about the basic requirement to evaluate anything, i.e. look at its each and every aspect, the technology is provideng us the way to read and understand it throughly and not manipulate us.
In a nutshell, Technology is a important to enhance our abilities to analyse situations to the best level and then decide the most relative outcomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...estion is not based on logical grounds. As it represents the idea of using technol...
^^
Line 2, column 365, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ource can be suitable but that does not effect his capabilities. It sharpens them it t...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...e, helps us to get rid of both of them. Therefore it supports our brain to work in the ri...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 207, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'forgotten'.
Suggestion: forgotten
...judgement. These people have definitely forgot about the basic requirement to evaluate...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ulate us. In a nutshell, Technology is a important to enhance our abilities to a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, likewise, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 315.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82222222222 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75046710342 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603174603175 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0480393218 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.21951772744 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151427990429 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406747340322 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036989960537 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709197368882 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333017710399 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.