The Government should focus on immediate problems and on the anticipated problems
The above statement forces the people in the government to move their focus to the problem we have in hand and not to concentrate on the unforeseen issues. this thinking will just keep us in a cycle of solving stuff, one thing is sloved we move on to the next one and then the next one it never comes to an end. As unplanned material in the past becomes the immediate thing that needs tobe dealt with today.
Firstly, everyone should understand that the moving our entire forces to the deal with one issue this itself is looking forward to make new issues and not being able to completely solve any. Similar kind of strategy is executed by the Pakistan officials and we all know that this is the major reason for them to be under financial burden constantly, they have failed to find a solution to any of the problems.
Secondly, without planning nobody can fulfil the onspot requirements of these issues as we require to get a certain amount of man power, certain amount of finances, certain amount of medical facilities, all the material required to solve the issue would not be available and in the worst case scenario the govenrnment would have definitely ran out of these even before all the problems come to an end.
Now, people would ask how to handle the on spot issues we need to set up a different teamto handle these issues as the government needs to focus on the upcoming ones. So, that at some point of time we are free from the problems and the cylcle of issues come to an end.
To conlcude, finding a solution to immedieate problems is important but we need to get it that they can't our major area of work as upcoming issues are also need to be solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...o concentrate on the unforeseen issues. this thinking will just keep us in a cycle o...
^^^^
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the next one it never comes to an end. As unplanned material in the past becomes ...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'getting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: getting
...uirements of these issues as we require to get a certain amount of man power, certain ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 341, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'run'.
Suggestion: run
...o the govenrnment would have definitely ran out of these even before all the proble...
^^^
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p a different teamto handle these issues as the government needs to focus on the ...
^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...portant but we need to get it that they cant our major area of work as upcoming issu...
^^^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'needed'.
Suggestion: needed
...rea of work as upcoming issues are also need to be solved.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 306.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49019607843 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36899930712 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 704.065955056 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.0894953694 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.666666667 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.0 23.4991977007 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.21951772744 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158125168093 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072860792826 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667112258726 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905332288162 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471221078525 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.7820224719 144% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.