As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology has surely been a boon to the human society since its advancement in various fields that have significantly reduced the time and efforts required such as connecting people from different places through social media and making transactions while sitting remotely anywhere with just an application. But at the same time this has also significantly abated the ability to memorize telephonic numbers, remembering your friends homes location and important dates since the introduction of smart phones. Though the human race is advancing towards a world of automation involving high tech devices and services, but this at the same time could reduce the capability to involve thought process and alleviate skills.
The smartphone when it was first launched seemed quite promising with all of the features it possessed. The smart device could calculate myriad set of calculations and a GPS tracking technology which could figure out where things were. The device also came with an internet connection bridging the gaps within the world. Introduction of social media helped people connect socially with the help of a smart device, but this highly depends on how one uses it. For some groups social media like Facebook, Instagram and other platforms have helped increase interactions, organizing get togethers while for some it did not lead to social bonding rather increased the gap.
Technology has created a gateway for humans to improve their quality of living with advancement rising exponentially. It is we who have to decide whether we want to spend an entire evening sitting beside our laptops and smart phones using social media or have a gathering with friends and relatives elevating social bonding and skills. With more time being spent on playing videos games and updating social media networks will deteriorate social skills and thought process. Instead, one should invest more into the merits of technological advancements and dedicate towards improving other aspects of life which are more important.
The recent technological advancement in numerous sectors has benefited human society with quality of life being ameliorated. This has also helped reduce quite a number of tasks which otherwise required complex involvement. The people have to choose between spending hours on social media or improve other aspects which could benefit the human society and enhance skills which are necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...st launched seemed quite promising with all of the features it possessed. The smart device...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 237, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ich could figure out where things were. The device also came with an internet conne...
^^^
Line 7, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on social media or improve other aspects which could benefit the human society an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2045.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43882978723 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69473434651 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577127659574 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.297896025 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0666666667 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168576809972 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620819347479 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408986502087 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110792858886 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394820243027 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 11.8971910112 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.