As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In recent trends, it is largely seen that people rely heavily on newly invented technology to do their work. However, it is the people only who invents new technology, and use it to make their work less cumbersome. So, it would be probable to say that people only are responsible for their own loss of ability to think for themselves. The statement above holds very much credibility, if we see in today's world, how does people's day start and end, they use automobiles as commute for going to work, at the work place they use laptops, also they use air conditioners for their comfort, to connect with the family members while at work they use mobile phones which use wireless networks for communication.
Also, as more and more technology is being invented it is leading to loss of personal touch within humans. Historically, it is seen that people use to meet every alternate day for leisure, gossip and roam around, which used to relieve stress and enhance the bonds of relationship with everyone, but nowadays, this has been replaced by meeting over the internet, doing video calls, chatting and much more, at last leading to the fact that people are adopting such technology due to laziness, they think why should we go out, rather we can sit at home and meet anyone, at any time we want by making use of the boon (technology). In doing so, humans are neglecting the fact that they are eventually inclining towards gradually reducing the intellectual of thinking about oneself.
Their is no doubt that technology is seeming to be a blessing in disguise. But it can prove to be more harmful than beneficial if not used in a limited way, it is very much necessary to put a restriction in using the new inventions to a particular extent. For example, in earlier times when somebody wanted to get knowledge about a particular thing, he/she would go to library and find about it, but as soon as internet came into being, specially "Google", people have forgotten that libraries exist today also, they simply ask it to their "wireless mentor" who gives them answer in just fraction of seconds. This will lead to eventually extinction of libraries, and also the cerebral capacity of people to think what is good for them and what is not.
However, if we see the positive side of the technology, it has given many good results also. Like, before many people used to face much problems in saving their money, they had nothing much available where they can safely keep their money and earn interest on it, but now today, we can save our money in bank which guarantees safety as well as profitable returns. So it depends on the perspective of how we want to consider technology as, we wish to accept it as a gift or not.
The above statement holds much weight, but contrary to that we cannot ignore the good things we got by invention of technologies.
Finally, I wish to conclude that humans should not regularly use technology in solving the problems, first they should try on their own, and consider technology as a backup, which they can use at last if they fail to solve their problems on their own, they should consider technology as a precious item, and use it wisely only when it is needed, by doing so people can avoid leading to deterioration of their ability to think for themselves. Also, I would like to add that their is very minor difference in utilizing and excessively using the technology, which if people understand than technology can be very very helpful in shaping the future of human kind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...s. Historically, it is seen that people use to meet every alternate day for leisure...
^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...o laziness, they think why should we go out, rather we can sit at home and meet any...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: There
...ellectual of thinking about oneself. Their is no doubt that technology is seeming ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...f. Their is no doubt that technology is seeming to be a blessing in disguise. But it ca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a limited way" with adverb for "limited"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ore harmful than beneficial if not used in a limited way, it is very much necessary to put a res...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...hnology, it has given many good results also. Like, before many people used to face ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
.... Like, before many people used to face much problems in saving their money, they ha...
^^^^
Line 10, column 475, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...selves. Also, I would like to add that their is very minor difference in utilizing a...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 563, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...excessively using the technology, which if people understand than technology can b...
^^
Line 10, column 607, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: very
...eople understand than technology can be very very helpful in shaping the future of human ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, well, while, for example, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 74.0 33.0505617978 224% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2922.0 2235.4752809 131% => OK
No of words: 616.0 442.535393258 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74350649351 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.98190197535 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68429926739 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 299.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48538961039 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 927.0 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 23.0359550562 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 132.84952593 60.3974514979 220% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 171.882352941 118.986275619 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.2352941176 23.4991977007 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 5.21951772744 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186464796365 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680641762657 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437864085973 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.098039499813 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0485413427246 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.4 48.8420337079 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 100.480337079 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.2143820225 146% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.