“As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.”
The technology has improved with years and it has become one of the main important thing in our life in our society. Indeed, nowadays, every people has in their possess a smartphone, a tablet or a computer. This means that people spend an excessive amount of time by looking in their technologies. In fact, people can't stop relying on these techonologies to solve their problem. This will train surely the ability of human to think for themselves to deteriorate.
Firstly, people has become more and more lazy. By this fact, it means that people are always looking to find the easiest way to respond to their criteria. For example, a artificiel intelligence (AI) called ChatGPT, has increased in popularity because with just few informations , this AI can provide you a list of things. If you want to organise a trip somewhere, just tap few information about what you want to do there and ChatGPT can provide a whole planning for your tip. This means that just fewer people are still looking in books to find their informations.
Secondly, people use technology also in work to solve their problems. For example, if a doctor has an issue about a patient and he need to act fast, he won't start looking in the medical books but he will try to find informations into internet with others examples of patients. This means that he will have the reflex to check internet before checking from himself.
The ability of humans to think for themselves is already in them. It is something that the human can control but he choose to not listen to himself and to resolve its problems with technology.
To sum up, with years, people are becoming lazier and this implied that technology will just not stop grow in the future and this means that the ability of humans to think for themselves will deteriorate.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... in their technologies. In fact, people cant stop relying on these techonologies to ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...respond to their criteria. For example, a artificiel intelligence AI called ChatG...
^
Line 2, column 275, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...arity because with just few informations , this AI can provide you a list of thing...
^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
... to organise a trip somewhere, just tap few information about what you want to do t...
^^^
Line 2, column 371, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little information'.
Suggestion: little information
... to organise a trip somewhere, just tap few information about what you want to do there and Cha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... wont start looking in the medical books but he will try to find informations int...
^^
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'chooses'.
Suggestion: chooses
...thing that the human can control but he choose to not listen to himself and to resolve...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, for example, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74440894569 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60099072365 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504792332268 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.4917667442 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8125 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336489253502 0.243740707755 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122008955583 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117716435694 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196526997567 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0750002441044 0.0667264976115 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.