As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Reliance on technology to solve problems does not necessarily deteriorate the capability of humans to think for them, it rather implores the individual to explore further horizons—hence I’d like to state that I tend to partially disagree with the claim.
Quotidian tasks hold no important roles except that of requisites necessary for a bigger innovation. If all of mankind would simple give up on the use of until-technology and go back to primitive methods of problem solving, evolution will take a break from its definition to move backwards, wouldn’t it? They say Rome was not built in a day but they don’t quote the time it took and the base it needed. As an evolutionary species our role is to move forward and that can only be done with constant dismissal of inefficient modeling and taking upon the most efficient approaches.
The idea behind ‘relying’ on technology more is a rather simple one. Take any kind of talent for example—what is talent really? It’s not the gift you are born with. Talent is rather your proclivity to learn the most efficient route to do something you love. The simpler the things are, the less friction is created, the smoother it’ll flow and consequently, the better we are able to innovate.
Applying that idea to technology, if we use the already available resources, it’s a reduction in effort—you are making things simpler, ergo, making way for more innovation to come forth. This ideology, in no way is deteriorating to the bigger picture.
Surely, there might come a time whence being heavily relied on technology we may render ourselves incapable of monotonous approaches of thinking and working but that also means that we’ve evolved from a much simpler time- like that- would you be fascinated with a rolling wheel or would you be more fascinated with a hover board? Let me guess.
All in all, the dependence of technology mustn’t be encouraged if the individual is still grabbing his basics; come of age where he can rely on his intuition and be ready to explore the current frontier.
Words, of a wise man come to mind- “To seek higher truths, you first eliminate the simpler lies.”
So no, as people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely not deteriorate, instead it’ll leeway a better denizen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...el or would you be more fascinated with a hover board? Let me guess. All in all, the ...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'may', 'really', 'so', 'still', 'for example', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.209205020921 0.240241500013 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.182008368201 0.157235817809 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0585774058577 0.0880659088768 67% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0627615062762 0.0497285424764 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0669456066946 0.0444667217837 151% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.10460251046 0.12292977631 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0376569037657 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.03348190995 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0397489539749 0.030933414821 128% => OK
Particles: 0.00209205020921 0.0016655270985 126% => OK
Determiners: 0.0878661087866 0.0997080785238 88% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0188284518828 0.0249443105267 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00418410041841 0.0148568991511 28% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2393.0 2732.02544248 88% => OK
No of words: 395.0 452.878318584 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.0582278481 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.58838876751 97% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.354430379747 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270886075949 0.280924506359 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.210126582278 0.200843997647 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.164556962025 0.132149295362 125% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03348190995 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 219.290929204 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587341772152 0.48968727796 120% => OK
Word variations: 70.1219785563 55.4138127331 127% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 24.6875 23.380412469 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 92.6315787137 59.4972553346 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.5625 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6875 23.380412469 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.674092028746 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.94800884956 162% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 51.7761075949 51.4728631049 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.12751677852 1.64882698954 68% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.49181742623 0.391690518653 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0681305709073 0.123202303941 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0666740195227 0.077325440228 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.640312115899 0.547984918172 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.275669238858 0.149214159877 185% => Sentences are changing often in a paragraphs.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181456942878 0.161403998019 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116953826071 0.0892212321368 131% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.217608930309 0.385218514788 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0916767358859 0.0692045440612 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.280564137691 0.275328986314 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108975213052 0.0653680567796 167% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 13.5995575221 74% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.