As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
while it can be said that reliance on technology make humans lazy, It is not largely true that it makes human ability to think deteriorate. Take the GPS for example. Most mobile devices come equipped with GPS, and unfortunately, people misuse it. My neighbor is a good example of how lazy reliance on technology can make human. We reside in a 20 minutes walking distance from Walmart, but he cannot drive to Walmart without his GPS turned on. It should be an undisputed fact that not all humans thinking. Some actually will prefer someone else or something to think on their behalf. It will be a wild generalization that reliance on technology in whatever capacity to solve problems will diminish human ability to think for themselves.That being said, technology actually increases human ability to think
Search engines have increased people's thirst for knowledge and problem solving abilities. Individuals now think of ways to solve their problems because they know where to get help. As an individual the advent of the World Wide Web has increased my thinking greatly. There are problems I create for the fun of finding solution to them, and technology has helped to achieve that. The other day, I messed up my electric sewing machine and I had to find a way to fix it using my knowledge of the complexity of the part.
The jet age has also brought a lot of problems with it that people have to really use their brains, if we are going to find solution. Cryopreservation is one of such. Because of technology, some people think that reviving a dead person technologically is possible. Cryogenics is a problem in my opinion, and people have to think if those people frozen at -195 degrees in a tank of Nitrogen are ever going to have a second shot at life.
Technology believe that technology has afforded people the opportunity to do with their brains what was once impossible. There are incurable diseases that scientists and medical personnel are having breakthroughs on because some people dare to think. Some forms of cancer, like breast and cervical cancer used to be incurable, but now with people thinking hard and aided by technology, new treatments and early detection machines are made possible.
In conclusion, reliance on technology will not make human ability to deteriorate, rather it will help sharpen and inform it. By the way, technology will not possible if humans were not thinking.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
while it can be said that reliance on technol...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 736, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...h human ability to think for themselves.That being said, technology actually increas...
^^^^
Line 1, column 805, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctually increases human ability to think Search engines have increased peoples th...
^^^
Line 2, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ms because they know where to get help. As an individual the advent of the World W...
^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er going to have a second shot at life. Technology believe that technology has a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...e a second shot at life. Technology believe that technology has afforded people the...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 50, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...gy believe that technology has afforded people the opportunity to do with their brains...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, really, second, so, while, for example, in conclusion, by the way, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90441176471 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79775197936 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546568627451 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 643.5 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3281277117 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21090320797 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643462574703 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498937153992 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123943878344 0.150359130593 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044781103949 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.